Rogerbee
Super Freak
LOL! Pretty much yeah!Oh well then instead of this..
View attachment 564524
View attachment 564525
We’ll get this..
View attachment 564526
View attachment 564527
LOL! Pretty much yeah!Oh well then instead of this..
View attachment 564524
View attachment 564525
We’ll get this..
View attachment 564526
View attachment 564527
Do we know yet who sculpted this one?The Sideshow outfit is looking nice, especially the boots.
But the Trevor sculpt is still my favourit.
I don't care what Sideshow's prototype looks like.... the only thing that matters is the final product. And judging by Sideshow's previous 1/6 stuff, no way this thing is worth the same kind of money as Hot Toys Clint Eastwood Marty Mcfly. I would love to be proven wrong, but my money is on this not being nearly worth the money.
nice, but my old Iminime is still the best...
Do we know yet who sculpted this one?
I asked this in a previous post, nobody replied. The pants in the SS pictures appear to be black, they should be a navy blue. Cannot really tell in the pictures.
Yeah despite their faults I still like my SS Indy & Snake.Does this come with the standard Sideshow hex stand? I'm not seeing it listed on the product page. i know a lot of folks rag on those stands, but I like them. They are flexible with the post and unobtrusive, as illustrated here:
View attachment 564567
These two figures certainly generated strong reactions upon their respective releases, but I still enjoy both of them on display in my collection.
I'm sure I'm in the minority, but if this Eastwood figure makes it through production anywhere near this quality, I'll be satisfied to display it alongside these SSC figures.
I'm also excited about the box art possibilities here. Sideshow can rise to the occasion when they are freed from the constraints imposed on them by a license holder (like the stale SW boxes).
I think the Eastwood proto looks pretty good. I hope Sideshow offers up some updates before it ships.
Also Sideshow is an American company that contracts out most of the design work unlike Chinese companies that have in-house teams.People need to realize this figure is expensive because it's double-dipping on license fees, the movie rights, plus Eastwood's likeness. There's probably at least 30% markup for both, compared to 15-20% for other movie licenses.
I personally like the proportions of the Sideshow bodies. They dont suffer from the short torso design that most companies and a lot of custom clothes are designed to "fit".Sideshow's recent stuff has been very good. Gambit turned out great. Lando looks good, the sculpt is off, but there's no problems with the paint. Their recent figures have shown minimal drop-off from proto to production. Too many folks here are basing them off their work from years ago. They just don't have any human faces in their recent work to compare to.
Is it just the headsculpt you prefer?
The tailoring looks much better on the SSC, their vest closes, the collar is properly scaled, the holster hangs with weight. Plus the body proportions are more accurate, as an added bonus, SSC has been going the extra mile lately and including nicely-painted, character-specific hands , not the shiny, generic KO hands that come with the iminime. Chalk that up to iminime using a generic body, while the SSC version captures Clint's lanky physique.
I'm not sure if the iminime is tailored incorrectly, or you put the belt on wrong, but the iminime gunbelt is backwards.
Overall, the SSC figure looks better.
Maybe no stand is the next step of laziness?The Sideshow hexagon stands suck. I’m sorry but they just do. They’re like the epitome of laziness.
Thing is they used to put a little more effort in with some printing. Now at most we get the film logo in black on a black stand (what kind of design choice is that?) or on the bottom where no one sees it.
Threezero holding it down with thatMaybe no stand is the next step of laziness?
They seem to come covered in scratches and finger prints these days anyway. Good ol’ Sideshow QC.Maybe no stand is the next step of laziness?
Looks awesome. They should have gone with the seamless neck like this oneI may offer a 1/6 head based on my digital sculpt
View attachment 564785View attachment 564786View attachment 564787
Enter your email address to join: