Premium Format SS Rogue Premium Format
- Thread starter fuzzylojiks
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
Well I don't think his ex head is that bad
The Ex head was taking from the angle so it looks better. It's a little misleading
C9
C10
C11
C12
I call this a bigger disaster than Rogue!
Well I don't think his ex head is that bad
The Ex head was taking from the angle so it looks better. It's a little misleading
Niptuck1919
Freakzoid
Re: Rogue
I have them all minus wolverine but they are all bad ass to me love the x men line cyclops I likes a lot not so much the ex head but regular was knock out rogue can be a lights out statue if the regular head gets corrected just like their promo pics, gambit is just straight awesome a must own if you are into x men pf love the gambit pf definitely my favorite!!!!!!!!
I have them all minus wolverine but they are all bad ass to me love the x men line cyclops I likes a lot not so much the ex head but regular was knock out rogue can be a lights out statue if the regular head gets corrected just like their promo pics, gambit is just straight awesome a must own if you are into x men pf love the gambit pf definitely my favorite!!!!!!!!
Boba Ben
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
VS1976
Super Freak
I it's better then SSc pics.
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
That's a shame. It was the perfect place to discuss the obvious problems with the Rogue PF. It's a shame that a few members feel the need to constantly protect SSC business strategies and integrity. It's not needed. There are SSC reps here that are uniquely qualified to do just that.
The fact that a few members can't civilly discuss this topic with collectors who have a legitimate gripe is unbelievable. It seems like the intent was to shut the thread down. The fact that they succeeded is a shame. SSC had a chance to discuss all of the mishaps of the Rogue PF directly with the members here. Because of the action of a few members that opportunity is now gone. I would rather that the mods take action against the few members that can't be civil than shut down the thread. Doing this just rewards them and allows them to continue the same course of action in other threads. I really feel this is the wrong precedent to set.
For those of you that reported a problem with your Rogue PF, please give SSC a chance to respond and set things right before you lose your cool. No business or person is perfect. When a mistake is made by anyone, give them a chance to set things straight. Good luck to the rest of you that are still waiting for your piece. I truly hope you all get a minty fresh one.
That's a shame. It was the perfect place to discuss the obvious problems with the Rogue PF. It's a shame that a few members feel the need to constantly protect SSC business strategies and integrity. It's not needed. There are SSC reps here that are uniquely qualified to do just that.
The fact that a few members can't civilly discuss this topic with collectors who have a legitimate gripe is unbelievable. It seems like the intent was to shut the thread down. The fact that they succeeded is a shame. SSC had a chance to discuss all of the mishaps of the Rogue PF directly with the members here. Because of the action of a few members that opportunity is now gone. I would rather that the mods take action against the few members that can't be civil than shut down the thread. Doing this just rewards them and allows them to continue the same course of action in other threads. I really feel this is the wrong precedent to set.
For those of you that reported a problem with your Rogue PF, please give SSC a chance to respond and set things right before you lose your cool. No business or person is perfect. When a mistake is made by anyone, give them a chance to set things straight. Good luck to the rest of you that are still waiting for your piece. I truly hope you all get a minty fresh one.
Last edited:
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
he does have a point. SSC doesnt owe us a thing other than an acceptable replacement and if they cant do that then a full refund.
Figured they could've saved all the drama if they had been more up front with what they obviously knew was a problem to begin with so that international customers wouldnt have to go thru the trouble of doing
charge backs for erroneous duties and fees.
Live and learn, it is the internet and what good is the internet if you cant voice your opinion? This is not communist Cuba.
he does have a point. SSC doesnt owe us a thing other than an acceptable replacement and if they cant do that then a full refund.
Figured they could've saved all the drama if they had been more up front with what they obviously knew was a problem to begin with so that international customers wouldnt have to go thru the trouble of doing
charge backs for erroneous duties and fees.
Live and learn, it is the internet and what good is the internet if you cant voice your opinion? This is not communist Cuba.
Last edited:
nemenforcer
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 17, 2010
- Messages
- 6,609
- Reaction score
- 11
Re: Rogue
I replied to my email for replacement, this what I listed.
1. Rogue Print was glued to inside of envelope, parts were torn as I tried to take it out.
2. Regular Head has brown paint on white streak
3. Regular Head has sloppy eye shadow that looks watered down and uneven
4. Regular Head does not sit all the way in, leaving visible space between neck and body. Only fits if I take off jacket, tried multiple ways.
5. Exclusive Head has really cheaply painted head band, paint streaks show and it looks very watered down, off color. (website pics were a solid dark green)
6. Exclusive Head has cheap looking scratched in eyebrows. (website shows full eyebrows, not ones done with little hash lines)
7. Exclusive Head has cheap looking eye shadow, on right side there is only a line half way through.
7. On upper right side of stomach there is a water stain, hard to tell in pics but very visible in person
8. Leg bands have same cheap watery paint used on headbad
I replied to my email for replacement, this what I listed.
1. Rogue Print was glued to inside of envelope, parts were torn as I tried to take it out.
2. Regular Head has brown paint on white streak
3. Regular Head has sloppy eye shadow that looks watered down and uneven
4. Regular Head does not sit all the way in, leaving visible space between neck and body. Only fits if I take off jacket, tried multiple ways.
5. Exclusive Head has really cheaply painted head band, paint streaks show and it looks very watered down, off color. (website pics were a solid dark green)
6. Exclusive Head has cheap looking scratched in eyebrows. (website shows full eyebrows, not ones done with little hash lines)
7. Exclusive Head has cheap looking eye shadow, on right side there is only a line half way through.
7. On upper right side of stomach there is a water stain, hard to tell in pics but very visible in person
8. Leg bands have same cheap watery paint used on headbad
Mesa
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
That was the impression I got. I'm just monitoring the situation, didn't have much to add, but some people seemed to just want to start stuff, especially with you. It seemed very uncalled for. I stopped in a few times here and was shocked at how frickin' petty ____ had gotten. It seems to becoming pretty routine, which is partly why I'm less active on this board lately; it just takes too much energy to sort through the BS.
What was the other thread that now got closed? Was it closed, or deleted?
That was the impression I got. I'm just monitoring the situation, didn't have much to add, but some people seemed to just want to start stuff, especially with you. It seemed very uncalled for. I stopped in a few times here and was shocked at how frickin' petty ____ had gotten. It seems to becoming pretty routine, which is partly why I'm less active on this board lately; it just takes too much energy to sort through the BS.
What was the other thread that now got closed? Was it closed, or deleted?
Andy
Freakzoid
Re: Rogue
I got my EX yesterday but haven't opened it yet. Now I'm nervous....
I got my EX yesterday but haven't opened it yet. Now I'm nervous....
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
Barbarian 
Watch him get Pissy after reading this.
I noticed some random people seem to deliberately try to start scraps with fuzzylojiks..hmmm wonder why...and who they work for
Barbarian
Watch him get Pissy after reading this.
fuzzylojiks
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: Rogue
^Wow I just got an infraction for this post. Looks like the mods are on their side too. That was pretty much just a statement of exactly what happened in the thread. I'm done with this if they want to ban me from the board I have no problems, I've tried to contribute to this board as much as I can, but if they keep giving me infractions for just telling the truth instead of the real trolls who use words like 'tittybabies' and try to get threads closed when they didn't even order the product I'm out. I've had enough of being abused.
^Wow I just got an infraction for this post. Looks like the mods are on their side too. That was pretty much just a statement of exactly what happened in the thread. I'm done with this if they want to ban me from the board I have no problems, I've tried to contribute to this board as much as I can, but if they keep giving me infractions for just telling the truth instead of the real trolls who use words like 'tittybabies' and try to get threads closed when they didn't even order the product I'm out. I've had enough of being abused.
Last edited:
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
That sucks bro. Well at least u get a warning (right or wrong). I didn't even get that at SF.
That sucks bro. Well at least u get a warning (right or wrong). I didn't even get that at SF.
Barbarian
Super Freak
fuzzylojiks
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: Rogue
No I didn't get a warning, just an infraction. There was no profanity in that post and I was just stating a fair assessment of what happened.
No I didn't get a warning, just an infraction. There was no profanity in that post and I was just stating a fair assessment of what happened.
Barbarian
Super Freak
fuzzylojiks
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2010
- Messages
- 8,200
- Reaction score
- 0
Re: Rogue
Who nam or devil? Both of them were in there trolling calling people 'whiners' and 'tittybabies'. That's a direct quote so there's no cause for an infraction there.
Who nam or devil? Both of them were in there trolling calling people 'whiners' and 'tittybabies'. That's a direct quote so there's no cause for an infraction there.
VS1976
Super Freak
Re: Rogue
I smell a rat here?
I smell a rat here?
