Star Wars: The Last Jedi (Dec 15th, 2017)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Disney Star Wars is the new disco, ...and "disco Sucks"
 
Hmmm....how about new Disney owned franchises is the new disco lol

Definitely. Disney is in a 'disco' era... GOTG2, Thor 3...


tenor.gif
 
Your story is extremely detailed but I'm afraid way too complicated for children, which is what Star Wars is for after all. Disney wants legions of children to grow up dedicated to Star Wars.

Plus, you are dismissing Kylo and giving Snoke his story. I believe Snoke will remain the Palpatine-villain... and it is Kylo who will fulfill his grandfather's destiny -- meaning bring balance to the force by saving Rey and killing Snoke in a Vader-esque sacrifice (which is not the destiny he's dreaming of, but it is the destiny he is destined for). I've said so from day one and I still believe this to be the basic repetitive storyline in keeping with Skywalker lore. I see nothing in the trailer to dismiss that theory. Of course we won't know until 2019 when this thing finally finishes.

I doubt Johnson would agree to participate in a straight up rehash of the OT. Abrams would, but Johnson, no.
 
We shall see....

Rian can do what he wants -- he has the middle one. Disney brought back JJ for a reason. The reason you just stated.

I'm 99.9% sure the studio brought Abrams back because he can't be bullied by Kennedy. They saw a pattern of unprofessional micromanaging on her part and addressed it the best way possible. Now Kennedy can [has to] just sit back and relax because JJ cannot and will not be micromanaged.
 
JJ doesn't have to be micromanaged because he gives the best "corporate delivery" in the business.

By hiring JJ, Disney just put Star Wars on auto-pilot.








tumblr_nr2obzy08k1qcoaf4o1_400.gif
 
Porg ain't halal or kosher...can't believe Disney would be so offensive
 
JJ doesn't have to be micromanaged because he gives the best "corporate delivery" in the business.

By hiring JJ, Disney just put Star Wars on auto-pilot.

I find your lack of faith in JJ's artistic abilities disturbing. Now, had you said Ron Howard with HS - then you'd be on the money. With JJ, you're way off.

JJ is a great filmmaker. What people saw as "rehashed" in TFA didn't come from a safe studio mandate. It came from fanboyism at its best. He made the ROTJ sequel many thought couldn't be made. He did a fantastic job and most importantly - he cemented how powerful he is on set.
 
I find your lack of faith in JJ's artistic abilities disturbing. Now, had you said Ron Howard with HS - then you'd be on the money. With JJ, you're way off.

JJ is a great filmmaker. What people saw as "rehashed" in TFA didn't come from a safe studio mandate. It came from fanboyism at its best. He made the ROTJ sequel many thought couldn't be made. He did a fantastic job and most importantly - he cemented how powerful he is on set.

WHAT!@!!?

You speak of JJ like you speak of Villeneuve? This makes no sense in your auteur-speak.

JJ is a great 'copier'. He's not innovative.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top