This looks great so far. I am cautiously optimistic.
I thought it looked fun! To be fair I haven’t seen a Superman movie which I haven’t liked though.
Which is weird as I haven’t read a lot of Superman comics.
None of this makes them look any better in live action.To the “no trunks” people, mind ya business…Supes has been rocking the undies for 79 of his 86 years (78 and a half if I’m being generous and count that Superman Red/Blue business that lasted for 6 months) and nobody had a problem with it until Jim Lee came in with his busy ass redesign. You guys don’t even get to do the “it’s new and exciting” and “times change” **** anymore because he’s had them back in the comics for the last 7 years and looks as great as ever (don’t believe me? Peep Dan Mora’s art over the last few years and tell me that it hampers the design in any way)…
What he said!To the “no trunks” people, mind ya business…Supes has been rocking the undies for 79 of his 86 years (78 and a half if I’m being generous and count that Superman Red/Blue business that lasted for 6 months) and nobody had a problem with it until Jim Lee came in with his busy ass redesign. You guys don’t even get to do the “it’s new and exciting” and “times change” **** anymore because he’s had them back in the comics for the last 7 years and looks as great as ever (don’t believe me? Peep Dan Mora’s art over the last few years and tell me that it hampers the design in any way)…
Agree to disagree. It didn’t hamper my enjoyment of the Donner film any and I didn’t see it until probably two decades after its original release. Watched it a few months ago as an adult and it still held up. I grew up watching Lois & Clark…once again: loved it. And Cain’s was probably the most flashy of the suits with its satiny sheen. The other thing to remember is: these are ******* comic books. They are men in tights. They have always been men in tights. Complaining about the aesthetics of superhero costumes in movies reflecting how they’ve always looked is tantamount to watching a Shakespeare play and then bitching about the ruffs and pantaloons.None of this makes them look any better in live action.
They aren't though. They are movies based on comic books. Movies generally look and feel like our world/reality and are much closer to what we experience than a comic book could ever be.Agree to disagree. It didn’t hamper my enjoyment of the Donner film any and I didn’t see it until probably two decades after its original release. Watched it a few months ago as an adult and it still held up. I grew up watching Lois & Clark…once again: loved it. And Cain’s was probably the most flashy of the suits with its satiny sheen. The other thing to remember is: these are ******* comic books. They are men in tights. They have always been men in tights. Complaining about the aesthetics of superhero costumes in movies reflecting how they’ve always looked is tantamount to watching a Shakespeare play and then bitching about the ruffs and pantaloons.
Just because people have deigned to reclassify comic books as deadly serious adult fare because they feel the need to qualify their love of something fundamentally immature out of insecurity, that doesn’t change the fact that, for over 75 years, Superman was a guy in tights, with red underwear and a cape, flying around with his cousin and their superpowered dog, horse, monkey and cat…who also wore capes.
I haven’t seen a Superman movie which I haven’t liked though.
But, again, that would be the case, had the adaptations of these characters over the past century not directly reflected the norms and aesthetics of the books themselves. People fail to realize that you can’t put lipstick on a pig. Captain America from the MCU would look ridiculous if you saw him in real life because…people don’t just walk around in multi-colored crazy get-ups in our reality. Our brains aren’t wired to accept it. And trying to normalize it and ground it in realism raises its own issues. George Clooney’s Batsuit is probably more “realistic” than Adam West’s. Doesn’t make it any less ridiculous.They aren't though. They are movies based on comic books. Movies generally look and feel like our world/reality and are much closer to what we experience than a comic book could ever be.
Don't you think Batman would be taking steroids?But, again, that would be the case, had the adaptations of these characters over the past century not directly reflected the norms and aesthetics of the books themselves. People fail to realize that you can’t put lipstick on a pig. Captain America from the MCU would look ridiculous if you saw him in real life because…people don’t just walk around in multi-colored crazy get-ups in our reality. Our brains aren’t wired to accept it. And trying to normalize it and ground it in realism raises its own issues. George Clooney’s Batsuit is probably more “realistic” than Adam West’s. Doesn’t make it any less ridiculous.
Same goes for your boy. Try as he might to “ground him,” Snyder made Affleck look like a roidhead with bubblegut and his cowl was so constricting against his face that he could’ve had a brain hemorrhage. For the record, I’m not saying Superman in this doesn’t look ridiculous. I’m saying that he’s always looked ridiculous…and that is perfectly fine. To put it far more eloquently than I could ever, “Say, man. That is one bad outfiiiiiit!”
Enter your email address to join: