All companies lie, but I'm inclined to believe what they said regarding the chrome, as I had heard similar from PCS. Regardless what people think about Chronicle, there's no doubting they are quite passionate about what they do and pride themselves on film accuracy. I know if chrome was a viable option for them, they would've used it. I can't think of one reason why they wouldn't.
I hear people call Sideshow lazy and cheap for using plastic in some statues as well, yet I've heard from 3 different companies now that producing in plastic actually costs more when talking low edition sizes.
I'm not defending Sideshow at all. I'm far from a fanboy...I'm simply calling it as it is. This topic has been discussed with enough manufacturers now to suggest that there is more to this than simply buying some chrome paint. Using one paint to another has literally nothing to do with laziness as it wouldn't take any extra effort to do so, which lends me to believe that there must be more reason to it. If Sideshow released a silver endo and Chronicle did a chrome one, I would be inclined to think Sideshow cheapened out, but with Chronicle going a similar route, it's kind of hard to suggest Sideshow is lazy, unless we are implying that Chronicle were lazy too, which I doubt it considering how much their endo was delayed trying to get the paint finish right.