Terminator 1 Premium Format

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yes, you have!!! :lecture :D

rogue_statue_sideshow.jpg

:lol:lol:lol
 
If you're going to play spot-the-difference between a photo of a nude action figure and a photo of the real Arnold Schwarzennegger, yes chances are you'll find a lot of differences. I'm sorry but its a pointless exercise, its not really proving anything.
 
My only issue with the EB body is it uses plastic joints which I fear might break over time and you can't make the arms perfectly straight down by his sides. If you want him standing with his arms not looking like they're in some sort of ballerina stance you have to rotate his elbows in and bend them slightly as in the photo of the nude figure above.
 
I have loosely followed this tread, and have seen alot of differant opinions on what is the best terminator collectable. As I see it they are all nice and best is just an opinion. I really like the t1 pf because the likeness is good the body is great and the tailoring is amazing. I also like the t2 enterbay because the likeness is also very good the materials are great(love that its leather) and it comes with a load of accessoires. Now the t2 pf has a very good likeness but the body looks to thin. None are perfect, but all are great pieces. I do not have any but have been tempted on getting the enterbay t2 or the t1 pf, but I collect 1:6 personally and I'm more than happy with my hot toys t-1 and t-2. In the end we all like what we like, but we do not have to make others like it. Just enjoy what you like:)
 
NOT BOOM...yet.
Check this photo carefully, mate!
Notice the length of upper arm and the hight of forehead.
d0o0r0qt.jpg
Those two *cough* inaccuracies *cough* caused by the different angles&position of the head, arm (figure vs real Arnold) and figure to camera/Arnold to camera positions. You pretend to be eagle-eye-of-the-universe-№1 but it really looks like you don't know absolutely anything about actual comparisons and photo distortion.

Starting from those "3 heads is a row", ending this last "ZOMG look at the upper arm". Arm-nitpick is the most funny actually, because that means what, like Enterbay did his left arm bigger than the right? :lol
Just ask somebody to take two pics of yourself with a slightly different positions/camera angles, open a photoshop, do comparison pics & check how inaccurate you yourself are.

Usually, I'm not the one who will argue with comparison-guys like you, but sometimes you guys just so annoying & so know-it-all. Again, if at least you knew what you are talking about but no, that's not the case.

And this situation is not new to this thread. This post for example. It's 100% clear that he doesn't even realize that pics of the figure he is using was shot with a cheap ass camera with a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge lens distortion from the close range in a situation when actual object is very small (all this factors are extremely important) & original Arnold pics was made using professional camera with little-to none distortion. Ask any photographer, learn the photography basics & etc. Don't generalize with smth like "this is so awful & inaccurate!" when you don't even understand what you are talking about. A little bit more diplomacy will work great, trust me. At least don't generalize like this before you actually seen pieces in person. And no, of course HD-1004 is not 100% accurate to the actual Arnold. Some guys can always find flaws even in laser-scanned pieces (lol) and this piece was sculpted by artist (alive human being, not a machine that can recreate micrometre identical copy, decided to point that out, just in case), but it really is a product to appreciate in terms of screen accuracy.

For the record - this last PF body is much more inaccurate to the actual Arnold than Enterbay HD-1004 (and the fact that HD-1004 is an action figure makes me appreciate it even more). PFF is close to him, but he has a little bit short legs (not midget-like short legs but short legs if we are talking about Schwarzenegger proportions) & small waist (Arnold has huge waist, that's a fact for anybody who is or was interested not only in Hollywood career but also in his bodybuilder career).
I own & love both T1 PFF & HD-1004, they're both great, but you can't comparison them in terms of overall quality & accuracy. HD-1004 is a huge step forward. And that comes from the T1-guy. I would LOVE T1 PFF to be better but it's not. The only problem with a HD-1004 for some guys is that it's action figure. So it's up to the owner how to pose & present the piece. That's why some pieces look like a real Arnold & some like a bad impersonators. But from everything we have on the market at the moment - it's absolutely best representation of Schwarzenegger as Terminator, when we are talking about scaled statues and figures.
 
To Sined: I don't even need to read ur freaky long thread...
U post this pics and then I told you this pics is completely useless to prove anything cuz angle and foucs length are just totally different.
"Three_heads" is a basic rule to produce a healthy male body, go check the barbarian photo I post and try to measure all the pics of this disgusting EB's body, then you will notice the truth---stop lying to yourself!
 
Back
Top