NOT BOOM...yet.
Check this photo carefully, mate!
Notice the length of upper arm and the hight of forehead.
Those two *cough* inaccuracies *cough* caused by the different angles&position of the head, arm (figure vs real Arnold) and figure to camera/Arnold to camera positions. You pretend to be eagle-eye-of-the-universe-№1 but it really looks like you don't know absolutely anything about actual comparisons and photo distortion.
Starting from those "3 heads is a row", ending this last "ZOMG look at the upper arm". Arm-nitpick is the most funny actually, because that means what, like Enterbay did his left arm bigger than the right?
Just ask somebody to take two pics of yourself with a slightly different positions/camera angles, open a photoshop, do comparison pics & check how inaccurate you yourself are.
Usually, I'm not the one who will argue with comparison-guys like you, but sometimes you guys just so annoying & so know-it-all. Again, if at least you knew what you are talking about but no, that's not the case.
And this situation is not new to this thread.
This post for example. It's 100% clear that he doesn't even realize that pics of the figure he is using was shot with a cheap ass camera with a huuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuge lens distortion from the close range in a situation when actual object is very small (all this factors are
extremely important) & original Arnold pics was made using professional camera with little-to none distortion. Ask any photographer, learn the photography basics & etc. Don't generalize with smth like "this is so awful & inaccurate!" when you don't even understand what you are talking about. A little bit more diplomacy will work great, trust me. At least don't generalize like this before you actually seen pieces in person. And no, of course HD-1004 is not 100% accurate to the actual Arnold. Some guys can always find flaws even in laser-scanned pieces (lol) and this piece was sculpted by artist (alive human being, not a machine that can recreate micrometre identical copy, decided to point that out, just in case), but it really is a product to appreciate in terms of screen accuracy.
For the record - this last PF body is much more inaccurate to the actual Arnold than Enterbay HD-1004 (and the fact that HD-1004 is an action figure makes me appreciate it even more). PFF is close to him, but he has a little bit short legs (not midget-like short legs but short legs if we are talking about Schwarzenegger proportions) & small waist (Arnold has huge waist, that's a fact for anybody who is or was interested not only in Hollywood career but also in his bodybuilder career).
I own & love both T1 PFF & HD-1004, they're both great, but you can't comparison them in terms of overall quality & accuracy. HD-1004 is a huge step forward. And that comes from the T1-guy. I would LOVE T1 PFF to be better but it's not. The only problem with a HD-1004 for some guys is that it's action figure. So it's up to the owner how to pose & present the piece. That's why some pieces look like a real Arnold & some like a bad impersonators. But from everything we have on the market at the moment - it's absolutely best representation of Schwarzenegger as Terminator, when we are talking about scaled statues and figures.