Terminator 4 ---- No Arnold ...

[samuraiwarrior]

NO ARNIE!? but Arnold is the Terminator! Why would they do that? Idiots!

 

[LOTRFan]

NO ARNIE!? but Arnold is the Terminator! Why would they do that? Idiots!

I am sure it is not a case of "they," but Arnold, he is a governor right now, right?!

Of course the best option is to let the francise be .... period.

 

[galactiboy]

Of course the best option is to let the francise be .... period.

Or to send a Terminator back in time to prevent the 3rd movie from ever happening

 

[Terminator 101]

No Arnold! No Terminator 4! It will suck, wont work!

Unless its all based in the future with T-800's every where, just might make it.

 

[buffy-collector]

No Arnold

The terminator is Arnold,but if its in the future it shall still rock.
I am excited for this film I loved the third film I liked the TX.T2 is probably the best story line ect but it had the worst villiain.T1 was good as it was more dark and scary.But three had the best villain.

When is the film and tv show due out??

The Sarah cronicles sounds bloody brill

 

[King Darkness]

I have to agree with most here. With out Arnold its just not Terminator. Its a standard sci-fi flick about the future with robots. I'm sure I'll watch it, but it wont be a "terminator" movie with out Arnold! They should have stopped at 2.

 

[BDboystoys]

No Arnold

The terminator is Arnold,but if its in the future it shall still rock.
I am excited for this film I loved the third film I liked the TX.T2 is probably the best story line ect but it had the worst villiain.T1 was good as it was more dark and scary.But three had the best villain.

When is the film and tv show due out??

The Sarah cronicles sounds bloody brill

T2 had the worst villain Id say that about the TX.

 

[galactiboy]

T2 had the worst villain Id say that about the TX.

Yeah, I didn't get the TX. It seemed like the T-1000 was much more versatile and interesting. It seemed like with the TX (lame name btw) the technology on her down-graded... didn't make much sense.

 

[Khev]

I think James Cameron is more essential to the Terminator series than Arnold. Like the future war flashbacks Reese had during the original; Arnold wasn't in any of those but they were awesome and still very "Terminator-ish". I could see a whole movie made in that vein.

Of course I'd want a 1980's Cameron to direct. No Terminators running around shouting "Come on, let's bust a move!" like in the 3D Universal Studios movie.

 

[Batty]

Ya' know, Camerons only directed 6 major movies. And it's been almost 10 years since Titanic. 10 years!!!! And I haven't heard anything about Avatar or Battle Angel in a long time. What's he been doing besides IMAX films?

 

[darth dypshyt]

Ya' know, Camerons only directed 6 major movies. And it's been almost 10 years since Titanic. 10 years!!!! And I haven't heard anything about Avatar or Battle Angel in a long time. What's he been doing besides IMAX films?

With the money he got from Titanic...he does what he pleases.. .

I think over the last few years, directing "studio" movies has taken a back seat..Don't forget the huge amount of stress/pressure he was under while making Titanic BEFORE it was released...

 

[Batty]

I think over the last few years, directing "studio" movies has taken a back seat..Don't forget the huge amount of stress/pressure he was under while making Titanic BEFORE it was released...

Well, he's had 10 years to get over it... And a few million dollars.

 

[Terminator 101]

I agree if they do a terminator 4 and its like the flash backs with endo's and hunter killer's flying around then ill be up for T4 without Arnie, without Concentrating on a main Character or terminator.

 

[Darth_Thorpe]

ok ill see it like i did T3 (i do not have anything to do with T3 in my house because it was a pointless film since when did john connor become a idiot in 3 if i could sware i would) the villian in 3 was ah jezz dont get me started. if T4 is not in the future then its just an add on to 3 and pointless.

T1 & T2 !!END OF!!

 

[PosterBoyKelly]

ok ill see it like i did T3 (i do not have anything to do with T3 in my house because it was a pointless film since when did john connor become a idiot in 3 if i could sware i would) the villian in 3 was ah jezz dont get me started. if T4 is not in the future then its just an add on to 3 and pointless.

T1 & T2 !!END OF!!

YES THANK YOU! Now I don't need to say anything!

 

[TOE]

T3's selling point was to have the model as a robot What were they thinking? ...Terminator is just not the same without Arnold.

 

[Trilogy]

I like T3 and the T-X is a great design. Sleaker, faster, built in powerful weapons (no need for guns) and could also manipulate other machinery aswell as shape shifting like the T1000.

 

[mannix DLS]

T2 was a good sequel. T3 was a good excuse to make some extra cash. T4, well, I don't even want to think about it.

I think so too

 

[LewisD]

I hope T4 will be based mainly on Kyle Reese...with character development between Kyle Reese and John Conner...imagine seeing the human resistance crushing Skynet's defense grid, infiltrating Skynet production factories, stealing T800s while fighting off machines, and Kyle Reese being sent thru the time displacement unit....it would make the Terminator series complete...I guess if the above happened, T4 would be the first "sequel/prequel".

 

[Anakin]

,.. no interest,..