The Incredible Hulk First Look!!!!!!

[Darth Caedus]

Too bad that Edward Norton is writing the script. Where did that come from.....?

 

[gabberjawa]

I think it came from edward norton!

Ed: "I write it or you get another Banner"

Marvel: "ok" *bends over*

 

[screamingmetal]

I'm really liking the new look! Gabberjawa's picture is the best I've seen of it:

So far so good. I hope the Hulk looks ripped in this one and not so smooth skinned. That was the part of Ang's CGI Hulk that I disliked the most, he should look scary not like a somewhat more muscular Shreck.
Having said that, I really liked the first one. I think Sirrobert is right on why people didn't like the first movie. I also think that it strayed too far from the comics a bit with Banner's relationship with his father. Still I thought it was a good story.

 

[p!tu]

 

[wookilar8]

Here'e a new image popping up to promote The Incredible Hulk.

 

[IronFingaz]

Looks awsome

Can't wait to see it!!!

 

[geto10]

Cool!

 

[Boba Fett]

Much better than that last atrocity.

 

[Fat Head]

I really dug the last movie, but this one better be heavy on HULK SMASH!

 

[Jen]

That picture of the Hulk looks amazing!! .....I guess those rumors that he might be grey were just that...rumors. I still love my grey Hulk anyway.

 

[bagelsncheesey]

This movie is gonna kick so much ****ing ass, it's not even funny

 

[Rob]

Much better than that last atrocity.

The last movie wasn't that bad, though as the director of the new Hulk movie put it; "It concentrated 75% on Banner and 25% on Hulk.", pretty much sums it up.

 

[automaton]

This movie is gonna kick so much ****ing ass, it's not even funny

yes indeed.

 

[MaulFan]

Is this the only full body image so far? Quality wise, it's hard to tell if it's the final CGI hulk or just a marketing illustration. HULK's marketing images were quite different from the final film's CGI design.

 

[thundergod]

Ang Lees HULK was a pretty good movie , but the problem was , IT FORGOT TO BE FUN ! At it's most basic , the Hulks stories were SF Monster/Action stories not Shakespearean tragedies . Subtext is one thing , but... Anyhow , THIS Hulk looks like a monster , I always thought the previous model was much too good looking ! Let's say I'm cautiosly optomistic about this one .

 

[thundergod]

Ang Lees HULK was a pretty good movie , but the problem was , IT FORGOT TO BE FUN ! At it's most basic , the Hulks stories were SF Monster/Action stories not Shakespearean tragedies . Subtext is one thing , but... Anyhow , THIS Hulk looks like a monster , I always thought the previous model was much too good looking ! Let's say I'm cautiosly optomistic about this one .

 

[The Mike]

If Ang Lee's version had actually Hulk'd out earlier and sped up the action a bit it would have been fine. The scenes in San Francisco and the Desert were well done...

 

[occulum]

from what I remember they had to make that Hulk a dark tragedy of sorts to convince Ang Lee to direct it. I believe he turned the movie down intially cause he didnt want to do a superhero movie.

that image has to be just an Illustration. no way is that a CGI/movie accurate Hulk.
If it is, I only think its OK.

 

[automaton]

the thing i liked abut Ang Lee's vision is that it didn't try and tell a story like a comic book would... i love it when creators utilize their chosen medium... unfortunately he strayed too far from the source material and gave us characters we had no attachment to.

 

[The Mike]

Actually I'd argue that Lee's Hulk made it more like a comic book especially during key scenes where the screen would literally break into panels. I thought it was an original take on this genre and definitely worth noting when comparing it to anything else but overall I think Lee's film was about Banner with the Hulk as sort of a side effect where as most of America was looking for a film about the Hulk.