- Joined
- Mar 13, 2010
- Messages
- 28,325
- Reaction score
- 32,687
I've never had cause to use this emoji, but this thread is the perfect place for a trial run...
I've never had cause to use this emoji, but this thread is the perfect place for a trial run...
i’ve read the books, there good. but the poems/songs almost kill them.
that’s what i didYou can fast forward through those.
Am a Hobbit fan. There's stuff in both trilogies I don't like. But I'm more forgiving than some about the Hobbit CGI; at least it seemed to me that Warner Brothers was keeping a real eye on the budget. The Hobbit cast went through a lot; like the stories about the goblin tunnel set being so hot people in costume were keeling over and vomiting in buckets.PJ couldn't even replicate what he did with LOTR for The Hobbit. As you said, it was a once in a lifetime achievement.
For sure.^ Yeah the castings were spot on in both trilogies.
I don't not like The Hobbit trilogy. I do find some enjoyment in it. I remember walking out of An Unexpected Journey really liking it. My favourite of the three.Am a Hobbit fan. There's stuff in both trilogies I don't like. But I'm more forgiving than some about the Hobbit CGI; at least it seemed to me that Warner Brothers was keeping a real eye on the budget. The Hobbit cast went through a lot; like the stories about the goblin tunnel set being so hot people in costume were keeling over and vomiting in buckets.
PJ to me had genius casting, too. Off the top of my head, can't think of any miscasts.
That's the thing; when I first saw the Hobbit trailers and later the movies just felt it all looked so rich (better than what I can imagine in my head) and LOTR of course has some magnificent shots.
I'll keep an open mind. Wasn't blown away but as teasers go, especially for material that little is known about - at least compared to the Hobbit and LOTR (I haven't been able to finish the Silmarillion) the teaser was pretty thin. I don't see Galadriel as Joan of Arc.
But Amazon am sure is well aware no matter what, they are gonna get at least initial backlash. At least Amazon has the money and stones to try with material like this. I'm not gonna complain about "no name actors" coz a lot of "known" actors wouldn't commit to 5 seasons of any series, and I didn't know that many of the GOT actors at first either.
i liked the second one the bestI don't not like The Hobbit trilogy. I do find some enjoyment in it. I remember walking out of An Unexpected Journey really liking it. My favourite of the three.
GoT casting was spot on. GoT was the first time seeing most of the actors anyway. Easy looking back now as most of them are big names now. Weren't at the time.
The second one was great because of Thranduil and Mirkwood but not so great because of Tauriel glowing like one of the Calaquendi and Smaug’s slapstick. The first one was closest to the LOTR film trilogy and more dwarf centric plus Rivendell knights were so amazing and unexpected.i liked the second one the best
But then you miss the famous poem about Gil-galad!You can fast forward through those.
But then you miss the famous poem about Gil-galad!
Gil-galad was an Elven-king.
Of him the harpers sadly sing:
The last whose realm was fair and free
Between the mountains and the sea.
His sword was long, his lance was keen.
His shining helm afar was seen.
The countless stars of heaven's field
Were mirrored in his silver shield.
But long ago he rode away,
And where he dwelleth none can say.
For into darkness fell his star;
In Mordor, where the shadows are.
i really liked all of it, the dwarves, gandalf doing his own thing and legolas (my favorite from the OG’s) was fun to have back.The second one was great because of Thranduil and Mirkwood but not so great because of Tauriel glowing like one of the Calaquendi and Smaug’s slapstick. The first one was closest to the LOTR film trilogy and more dwarf centric plus Rivendell knights were so amazing and unexpected.
I like the second best too tho Unexpected Journey is a lot of fun.i liked the second one the best
I like the barrel escape; but less the over-the-top obvious fuzzy CGI stuff. Mirkwood was awesome tho - great job on the White Hart, the spiders. Love Laketown too.the only thing i really can’t stand is the dwarves escape from the elves. it’s just so bad, CGI, the closeups. it felt like a disney movie.
Wait but isn’t Frodo supposed to be 50 in the books? I read that somewhere. Wood was 19 when he played frodo^ Yeah the castings were spot on in both trilogies.
hobbits live hundreds of yearsWait but isn’t Frodo supposed to be 50 in the books? I read that somewhere. Wood was 19 when he played frodo
Am a Hobbit fan. There's stuff in both trilogies I don't like. But I'm more forgiving than some about the Hobbit CGI; at least it seemed to me that Warner Brothers was keeping a real eye on the budget. The Hobbit cast went through a lot; like the stories about the goblin tunnel set being so hot people in costume were keeling over and vomiting in buckets.
PJ to me had genius casting, too. Off the top of my head, can't think of any miscasts.
That's the thing; when I first saw the Hobbit trailers and later the movies just felt it all looked so rich (better than what I can imagine in my head) and LOTR of course has some magnificent shots.
I'll keep an open mind. Wasn't blown away but as teasers go, especially for material that little is known about - at least compared to the Hobbit and LOTR (I haven't been able to finish the Silmarillion) the teaser was pretty thin. I don't see Galadriel as Joan of Arc.
But Amazon am sure is well aware no matter what, they are gonna get at least initial backlash. At least Amazon has the money and stones to try with material like this. I'm not gonna complain about "no name actors" coz a lot of "known" actors wouldn't commit to 5 seasons of any series, and I didn't know that many of the GOT actors at first either.
Enter your email address to join: