Marvel isn't one for allowing other cuts of their movies - it might conflict or complicate the all-important "canon".
Hence why they cut the Hela in NY scene from Ragnarok which had Odin's original death and have never shown it since. The scene exists out there and there is no doubt its something the fans would enjoy seeing - but because it might clash with "canon" we'll never see it. Its like they think the audience isn't clever enough to grasp what an alternative scene is.
I must say I am getting a little meh with the MCU and its slavish devotion to its own status-quo/tone/sameness/canon which always seems to promise something more interesting next time.
I liked Ragnarok, yes it was funny, but more importantly for me I liked it because it had real emotional narrative, the characters actually developed and the status quo was actually changed - Odin dead, Asgard permanently destroyed, Thor as fledgling king of his people, Loki and Thor finally truly reconciled.
Plus Hela was a break in a long MCU tradition of pretty bland villains by being pretty ******* awesome.
The Sakaar/Hulk stuff was alright, but not what I was invested in and took from the movie.
If this movie is just the Sakaar sequence - the movie. I.e.: a long adventure with no real stakes, motivation, character development and constant jokes for the sake of jokes - its not going to capture for me the elements that made Ragnarok one of the better MCU movies.
I think fans enjoy it when their heroes go through an actual character arc/development and the status quo is meaningfully changed by the events of the movie.
This might be why the more well-liked MCU movies are Winter Soldier, Civil War, Infinity War, Endgame, No Way Home & Ragnarok - because they are the films that have/emphasize these elements?
I am looking forward to this movie though and hope my growing doubts are put to rest.