Reefer Shark
Super Freak
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 5,162
- Reaction score
- 29
Come on over, we will throw back some (many) beers and I'll tell you everything I dislike about TLJ
Haha Im always down for many beers!
Come on over, we will throw back some (many) beers and I'll tell you everything I dislike about TLJ
My question too when I’m reading all the complaints here lol
Funny enough, I only seem to hear all the negative stuff online from the uber fans. Out of all the people I’ve spoken to in person, only one has expressed dissapointkent in the new movie. Everyone else has told me they loved it (and I’m in that camp as well). Not saying its a perfect movie, none of the Star Wars movies are. But honestly, thats certainly not what attracted everyone to these movies in the first place right?
With every day that goes by, I'm sympathizing more and more with the point of view that you're expressing here. But to be fair, the uber fans weren't as brutal with Force Awakens as with Last Jedi, so I think TLJ just pushed too many buttons for the same fans to accept it (with flaws and all) the way FA was accepted in spite of its own flaws.
I do think some of the criticism can be a bit hard to understand, though. Especially when the criticism could just as easily apply to the movies in the OT that we all love nearly unanimously. When a complaint is posted asking why Hux or Kylo didn't just destroy the Resistance ships in a more expeditious manner, I can't help but wonder why the answer isn't the same one as to the question of why Vader wanted to board the blockade runner in ANH instead of just having the Star Destroyer blow it to pieces (and the Death Star plans right along with it): it would have made for a really short movie. I think it's that simple. I don't mind that Vader chose to "tear this ship apart" until they "found those plans." If he had just used the Star Destroyer to destroy Leia's ship, we get no rest of the movie.
It's Star Wars, so we'll always want more (and better) than what we get, but I concede your point that many less-hardcore fans seem to be enjoying it without getting caught up in the flaws. The more hardcore fans just have a deeper understanding of the SW universe, and hold each new movie to that standard. I think Episode 9 can still make most people happy. It's not over yet. Fingers crossed.
So now all of a sudden we should be worried about realistic tactics in the Last Jedi? Not disputing the ridiculous plot elements in some parts, but Star Wars has never used realistic tactics in any of the movies. Stormtroopers have awful room clearing technique, etc etc. Point is, from a military standpoint, Star Wars is a complete mess WAY before TLJ. But that doesn’t stop us from enjoying it, so why start now?
With every day that goes by, I'm sympathizing more and more with the point of view that you're expressing here. But to be fair, the uber fans weren't as brutal with Force Awakens as with Last Jedi, so I think TLJ just pushed too many buttons for the same fans to accept it (with flaws and all) the way FA was accepted in spite of its own flaws.
I do think some of the criticism can be a bit hard to understand, though. Especially when the criticism could just as easily apply to the movies in the OT that we all love nearly unanimously. When a complaint is posted asking why Hux or Kylo didn't just destroy the Resistance ships in a more expeditious manner, I can't help but wonder why the answer isn't the same one as to the question of why Vader wanted to board the blockade runner in ANH instead of just having the Star Destroyer blow it to pieces (and the Death Star plans right along with it): it would have made for a really short movie. I think it's that simple. I don't mind that Vader chose to "tear this ship apart" until they "found those plans." If he had just used the Star Destroyer to destroy Leia's ship, we get no rest of the movie.
It's Star Wars, so we'll always want more (and better) than what we get, but I concede your point that many less-hardcore fans seem to be enjoying it without getting caught up in the flaws. The more hardcore fans just have a deeper understanding of the SW universe, and hold each new movie to that standard. I think Episode 9 can still make most people happy. It's not over yet. Fingers crossed.
You make a good point (and medicomsucks makes a good counter point lol).
The one thing thats for sure is that this is the most polarizing sw flick yet. I really think that it caught everyone off their toes, and the reactions are fairly extreme.
It’ll be interesting to see what people think after the movie has sunk in for a few years.
Yes I can't remember a movie that incited passion on this level...maybe the male lead being cast in 50 shades of...oh my god!
I love Star Wars. But it's a bit like family or friends that visit every few years - some visits are better than others. Right now it's visiting frequently and trying just a bit too damn hard to please everyone.
Ease up Disney/LFL. Marvel figured it out with Deadpool - when you're making multiple Superhero movies it's OK for them to target a specific audience sometimes. If I knew the game plan was the "episodes" are all ages slanting towards younger viewers and the "Stories" were for older fans like us... I think we'd all relax a bit.
I can't speak for the motivations of Kathleen Kennedy, but if what you wrote is true, then It's also a big gamble. Who do they think is buying the majority of star wars toys? I doubt it's children, maybe, but my suspicion is over 40 white men probably make up the bulk of consumers. Maybe that's why Lucas decided to sell it while he could still get something for it.
I think you're absolutely right. If Star Wars compartmentalized, and aimed their "Story" films at older audiences explicitly, fans of the original trilogy would likely be more open-minded toward some of the changes being made within the new trilogy. I really liked Rogue One, myself.
All of the original characters should have been relegated to the "Story" line. The new characters should have been given their own series, so that there was emphasis on character development instead of relying on nostalgia, which disappointed older audiences when the characters were handled frivolously. I still think that TLJ wasn't a very good movie, but it wouldn't evoke the contempt I have for the film, were it not:
- chauvinistically politicizing a mythology I grew up with, at me
- undermining the internal logic of the franchise,
- doing away with the subtext and thematic consistency of the original films,
- disregarding sensible character development for aging characters
Remove all that, and you have a benign, big budget film with bad dialogue and no plot. It wouldn't be worth commenting on, and I doubt I'd have bothered paying to see it. That's the issue though. Kathleen Kennedy wanted to benefit from nostalgia, while not feeling the need to cater to the demographic she was advertising to. It's honestly the most bizarre leadership I've ever seen for a franchise.
I can't speak for the motivations of Kathleen Kennedy, but if what you wrote is true, then It's also a big gamble. Who do they think is buying the majority of star wars toys? I doubt it's children, maybe, but my suspicion is over 40 white men probably make up the bulk of consumers. Maybe that's why Lucas decided to sell it while he could still get something for it.
Yes and no. You are correct that military tactics in Star Wars have always been a mess from day one.Yeah I agree with that. I’m just saying it’s intellectually dishonest for someone to complain about the tactics in TLJ but seemingly be fine with the tactics in previous movies. All Star Wars movies have horrible tactics and aren’t the best written movies, but they’re still fun.
F these new movies. Will never buy anything Disney/Star Wars.
If they release a Crait Luke everything else will be forgiven
Enter your email address to join: