Season 1 just felt more organic, better fleshed out, and like something Pizzolatto was really inspired to create. Season 2 is good in my opinion, much better than most other cop shows on TV, but it feels like it was created to fulfill a contractual obligation.
Lots of examples in music.
Good points. In the music biz it's known as the "sophomore slump."
You have your whole life to write your first album and then six months to compose & record the second.
I think that--like last season--a lot of the audience was overthinking the plot in an attempt to out-think the ending.
Rather than being a sign of a weak script, this actually reveals how much the plots & characters sucked viewers in.
Folks who bemoan the bleak endings this season just weren't paying attention.
The season telegraphed early on that it was a modern tale of Greek tragedy soaked in every noir trope in the book.
Can any of you honestly admit you thought early on that Birdman was a rogue vigilante?
<
Raises hand>
I had no idea initially
what Birdman's exact motive was, but the fact that Caspere's body was deliberately left out in public to be discovered suggested that his murderer wanted to expose his den of corruption. And that his murderer had no real outlets to do so. His murderer must therefore be
outside any of the main power structures (Vinci, Catalyst, Cartel).
There were folks convinced that Burress was the Birdman (which made
no sense from
any angle).
Some thought that Ray's father was the Birdman. (WTF?)
Quite a few insisted that Jordan was in league against Frank.
Last season, folks were convinced Rust was secretly behind the murders and working to divert suspicion.
Good mystery/detective stories have misdirection, red herrings, loose ends and they keep the viewer guessing.
And the truth is that most of the viewing public are lousy at detection.
The vast majority of people are as sharp as a bag of wet hair.
The comparisons of Season 1 vs. Season 2 are inevitable, but in an anthology series they become meaningless, IMO.
____