kryptonianmutie
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2016
- Messages
- 2,758
- Reaction score
- 24
Verbinski's The Ring remake >>>>>>>>>> original.
who is this?
sausage party >> CA:CW
in soviet russia ass sucks you.haha
who is this?
You feeling alright?
who is this?
Well said.I actually agree. I don't much care for Eisenberg's so far -- I think he was miscast -- but, Hackman's Luthor was every bit as ineptly characterized as Tommy Lee Jones's Two Face. Complete lack of understanding of the character. They made him into a greasy, leisure-suited used car salesman ... with a bumbling fool for a henchman. If Hackman had played him closer to his characters in Unforgiven or The Quick and the Dead, that would've been something to see. Sinister. Powerful. Threatening. Would've been perfect. Instead ... we get Hackman doing an impersonation of Eugene Levy in National Lampoon's Vacation.
I'll take Eisenberg's Lex Zuckerberg over that. At least there's something sinister there.
Eisenberg was good for the role because he's 6" smaller than Cavill and looks thin and fragile yet has this childish like power about his performance. It was a good castin' choice.I'd rather see Hackman play Luthor in BVS with the BVS script, but since that's impossible, I agree that the BVS Luthor is a better version of the character.
I like the Lex Luthor character more from BvS instead of from Superman I and II. He shows more intelligence and evil.
That said, I do not like the way Eisenberg played the character. The delivery of his lines during intense sequences felt absolutely forced. It's most evidenced on the building rooftop scene with Superman. And during that scene, what's up with his hand shaking too excessively while saying his lines? It was so overdone that I found myself looking at his hand more than his face. It was drawing that much attention.
1. The Halloween, Texas Chain Saw Massacre, Friday the 13th, and Saw franchises are all weak and boring in terms of story/depth and can barely support their own weight. They're classics for a reason, but I don't understand the appeal at all.
5. MCU > DCEU (I guess that's not really unpopular, LOL)
As a side note pertaining to #1, I just don't understand the appeal of horror films in general. I can understand wanting some adrenaline rush, and I most certainly understand the appeal of monster films with great special effects (I.E., Aliens, Predator, Pumpkinhead, etc.), but films about generic slashers with knives, chainsaws, etc., literally bore me to tears. How do you enjoy a film if the goal of the film is to sicken and/or disturb the audience? It makes zero sense to me, LOL.
Enter your email address to join: