I've pretty much memorized the entire park (DLR more so than DCA), but it's nice to see the different angles and perspectives from others.
This is probably a huge aspect of why I find well-done Disney parks photography so interesting (besides the subject matter).
Maybe-embarrassing admission, or maybe not when among kindred spirits. If insomnia hits, my method of falling asleep is to walk the parks. I pick a park, and just wander around in my head. I'm happy, I'm not bored (which is sort of weird but I don't care), and eventually - the brain gives up and I go to sleep. So WDW and DLR, I know like the back of John from Carousel of Progress's hand.
But despite seeing something dozens / hundreds / thousands of times, seeing it through someone else's eyes / lense - it's a different yet familiar experience : often the best kind.
Thanks for the kind words cokebabies! In regards to the semi-stylized look of my photos, part of it maybe the type of camera format I shoot which is a full frame that utilizes a larger sensor. I've heard many seasoned full frame shooters say there's a subtle ''pop" and 3D look that crop sensor cameras don't exhibit (crop sensors are found in Point & Shoot cameras and lower to mid range DSLRs). It could be, but I think it's probably more how an individual processes their work through Lightroom, Photoshop, etc. I also use additional software that can do things like enhance detail, adjust color contrast, etc. There is such a huge selection of tools that can really do wonders with images...it's just getting out there and trying to learn all this stuff. I'll probably get major flak for this, but for me personally, how one processes their images has become equally important to taking the actual photo itself.
(Does the math in his head) Okay, so it's not just "I'm pointing my point & click camera / phone in a less than ideal direction!"
As for your last point - to someone uneducated to the art, I can see that being a major factor now, and I personally don't see it as a stigma. That said, I wouldn't mind seeing some more raw (or RAW, depending) shots - to get an idea of the difference.
Okay, sorry for rambling on about the technical side which can get boring pretty fast to non photo geeks...LOL! I wasn't able to get a clear shot of the Pirates ride due to the area I was seated. I took the earliest reservation that day, hoping to beat the crowds and take some shots with my tripod. Unfortunately, while relatively empty, most guests request areas closest to the ride, so I wasn't able to access any of those viewpoints easily. I've attached a few more shots that have a somewhat partial POTC view as well as the outside entrance.
These are fantastic, thanks!
Hey coheteboy, other than my dragging a tripod to the parks for long exposure images, I don't see much difference between our stuff! In fact, you have a much better eye than me for a lot of the details which shows in your latest batch of photos! I also love how you use your unique perspective to show us aspects of the parks we might otherwise miss!
I feel like I'm defending both parents in a divorce - though I need to specify that is NOT related to any "competition" or anything like that. But you two are my favorite Disney park photogs on this board. I also find this easier to talk about, coming from a "Hey, my pictures are mediocre on their best day!" perspective.
Cohete really does have an amazing eye for detail - we'll see a statue or part of a park fifteen times walking around, but something about the way he "sees" it - it's refreshing. It probably helps than that lucky sumbitch seems to get to go to DLR on his lunch break.
/long post about Disney pictures where I don't post a single image.
edited to add : that's a pretty obnoxious amount of various punctuations