Wonder Woman - June 2, 2017

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
James Cameron treats objects like women, man...

According to Cameron a woman either needs to dress and act like a man or be forced to do this:

ao9kMHx.gif
 
And gloriously un-PC. Sounds like a blu-ray is *finally* in development.

Really!?!

Yet worldwide it still trails BvS. But WW is considered a success and BvS a failure. Whatever suits the narrative I guess...

While technically....

WW 800 million
BvS 873 million

BUT you're forgetting something!

Budget!

WW 149 million
BvS 250 milion

WW cost 101 million less to make therefore WW is ahead of BvS!
 
Ripley, Sarah and even Alice are strong female action heroes that women don't give a **** about. Those are still movies for men. More males read Woman Woman. More males saw the Wonder Woman movie. And more males prolly watched the TV show and beat it to Linda Carter.

Yup, but that's because women in general don't care about this stuff, the ones that do, and the ones that pretend to are still a minority compared to our sausage party.

I never beat my meat to Lynda Carter myself, but I wanted a giant blue GF when Abadah came out ;_; I suppose I objectified Cameron's female character in that.
 
While technically....

WW 800 million
BvS 873 million

BUT you're forgetting something!

Budget!

WW 149 million
BvS 250 milion

WW cost 101 million less to make therefore WW is ahead of BvS!


See, the numbers can be spun any way you like. And if that doesn't work, just say earnings don't equate to quality.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top