Two members asked how it was possible
Two members asked how it was possible
Marsden is probably the only actor I would want to be carried over in a reboot.
I thought he did a great job with what he was given (which wasn't much).
I haven't been following comics very closely over the last 15 years or so, but back in the day Cyclops was not the character you guys are describing. He did command respect of everyone except, well, Wolverine (and he really did have Wolvie's respect on some levels, even though they were combative). And Cyke was really the primary character that readers could connect to during what I consider to bet the greatest run I'm familiar with in the history of X-Men comics--the Claremont/Cockrum/Byrne period. He started stepping out of Prof. X's shadow, and learned how to manage a team of people who weren't natural team members. And was incredibly successful as leader, despite facing an onslaught of pretty major conflicts during this period. If you are a fan of those classic comics, it's hard not to also be a fan of Cyclops.
Ftr, I was talking about the Hobbit, you know that right? I adore the original LotR trilogy but Jackson is undoing every good thing he did with it with this new (*super mocking inflection*) "trilogy". Makes me sick. Freeman is god awful in that role. I will watch any iron man movie over these fat-suit debacles they call 'Hobbit movies'.
I started reading the XMen at about that exact time, and while I mostly agree with you, I also think that Cyclops was stuffy and uptight. He certainly wasn't the badass that Wolverine is. He was Wolverine's counterbalance, like some people have said, succeeding by being "good" and playing by the rules so to speak.
So I think the first two movies got the character mostly right. What I will concede is that the movies simply did not give him the chance to shine and be the central hero we know he can be. I think it was more egregious in the second movie because he was put out of commission pretty quickly.
I think a lot here are forgetting that the first two movies were at the dawn of modern comic book movies, and were a revelation to some of us fans. We were fearing the absolute worst from the first one. But what we got was a movie that for the most part showed real respect for the characters. Yes there were changes, and some characters were switched around. But really, believe me, it could have been much worse, and everything we had seen before (except for Blade) suggested that it would have been terrible in that the characters would not resemble their comic counterparts at all, just in name only. You know what I was expecting? Something like X3, just a bunch of super powered people fighting each other that you knew nothing about or cared at all about.
I can understand everyone's frustration. X3 and Origins were terrible and they practically undid any ground the first two movies gained. I actually think it's tainting many people's opinion over the entire franchise and sadly judging the first two even more harshly than they deserve to be because of them.
The ideal thing would have been to use FC as a reboot and start from scratch with the original X Men. Obviously they didn't, but I think the franchise is not lost. X3 can be ignored because everything that happened in it can be, and was, undone. Magneto got his powers back, Charles's consciousness survived, Phoenix was just Phoenix and not Jean (if you follow the comics), and Cyclops "died" offscreen, which means he didn't die at all. They're kind of ignoring Origins since they re used Emma Frost. And I think the central core group of characters are strong and can at the very least give us one last great movie in DOFP.
Jus think. They could reboot the franchise and try to "re-invent" the characters like they're doing for Fantastic Four!
Is an excellent description of Man of Steel.. . .just a bunch of super powered people fighting each other that you knew nothing about or cared at all about.
Okay so, this visual is insanely awesome imo.
(I put it in spoiler tags for those who don't watch trailers.)
I knew which one you were talking about. I'm sure there are many that agree with you. I would a million times over disagree with you though as I'm sure many others would. So it is what it is.
Funny that to me, this:
Is an excellent description of Man of Steel.
Kinberg on Fox' expanded Marvel Universe:
https://collider.com/deadpool-movie-rating-fox-marvel-movies/
He's heavily implying that Fox will venture into tie-in TV shows like Marvel.
Kinberg on Fox' expanded Marvel Universe:
https://collider.com/deadpool-movie-rating-fox-marvel-movies/
He's heavily implying that Fox will venture into tie-in TV shows like Marvel.
Enter your email address to join: