Spliff
Super Freak
looks badass. definitely prefer it over the awkward pose SS went with.
First, your Alex Ross comment makes no sense at all. Ross rarely feels the need to change what was great for years...Marvel Comics costumes and visuals of the 1960-70's have driven the industry for all these years. Those colorful concepts and designs can not be understated. No real need to change them or add your pretentious little details to improve (?) what the greats like Kirby, Romita, Wood, Ditko, etc. created. Sorry you and the Big Guy don't see that.
And second, the statue looks nothing like that drawing does of DD with a form-fitting costume. Heck, those togs and boots look like they were painted on...LOL But, hey, strap a shield to his back and put some webbing under the arms because you just can't leave well enough alone. Enjoy your $800 statue.
Sweet ignorance.
View attachment 156068
View attachment 156070
View attachment 156071
The only prick here is you. You don't even bother to read, you just spill around the same nostalgic bulls**t over and over again. I'm sure that when Marvel was dying the "colored visuals" really helped them avoid bankrupt.
And now Marvel is investing a s**tload of money in movies because people love spandex and colored diapers of course.
Move on, do yourself a favor and go cry in a corner babbling about the good ol' times.
I'm starting to feel like I want to stick a nail in my eye.
Not sure if I'm not expressing myself clearly here, or what.
Everything you said, I already know (including the last paragraph, which cracks me up everytime).
I'll try to put it very, very simple: there is one guy who acts like a jerk blabbering about 70-80's style suits and how they are untouchable "because they are classics", I just pointed out that, when needed, authors took their time to rework the costumes.
Of course Alex Ross changed Batman's suit and gave him an exoskeleton due to circumstances - which is exactly my point. If a Daredevil lived today, I'm pretty sure he wouldn't mind having a pair of straps on his legs and some padding on his shoulders. I don't see anything Earth shattering into this.
Now, I agree that it COULD seem busy (then again, it's too early to judge imho, I'll wait to see it painted) and I agree that tighter pants could be better for realism's sake. These are points that DO make sense and it's worth talking about.
The attitude I cannot stand is the simple and cyclical "yadda yadda classic costume yadda yadda", especially when served with a side dish of name calling and jerkish behavior.
I'll agree that there was no need to call them...well whatever he called the XM artists. That's on him. But as you said, In circumstances their might be a need to change a costume because "Insert Reason". However, I maintain and this is the last time I'm going to say it, that since we're dealing with a blind Lawyer who doesn't make tons of money because he deals with a lot of low income clients and either makes his costumes himself or gets them made by reformed failed Criminal(the Gladiator, Melvin Potter) something tells me his stuff won't be state of the art and needs to be flexible to pull off the acrobatic moves he does. So the XM costume changes, just don't make any damn sense.
What I'm seeing on this and the one of the other forums is that you are not allowed to say anything in the negative about XM's statues. The ones that have preordered their statues or wish to preorder the statues defend them with such venom that it's impossible to have any sort of conversation with them.
I think XM has tapped into a need in some collectors. Their artists are obviously fans of the comic book genre, and as with comic books, some changes people like and others don't. I just wonder how many $800 - $1,200 statues these collectors can continually afford?
Nah, fans don't defend XM blindly. Fans have a unique opportunity to give feedback, and in the other forum, even to communicate directly with XM. So it would be good to keep it civil and not lose this opportunity. I see people rip ARH and I wonder how averone ever have that much patience. Critiques can be constructive and collaborative (submission contests). Or you can be satisfied with the SSC business model and have 5 mth delays with no explanations. And I can see the validity in that as a business model.
I'll agree that there was no need to call them...well whatever he called the XM artists. That's on him. But as you said, In circumstances their might be a need to change a costume because "Insert Reason". However, I maintain and this is the last time I'm going to say it, that since we're dealing with a blind Lawyer who doesn't make tons of money because he deals with a lot of low income clients and either makes his costumes himself or gets them made by reformed failed Criminal(the Gladiator, Melvin Potter) something tells me his stuff won't be state of the art and needs to be flexible to pull off the acrobatic moves he does. So the XM costume changes, just don't make any damn sense.
What I'm seeing on this and the one of the other forums is that you are not allowed to say anything in the negative about XM's statues. The ones that have preordered their statues or wish to preorder the statues defend them with such venom that it's impossible to have any sort of conversation with them.
I think XM has tapped into a need in some collectors. Their artists are obviously fans of the comic book genre, and as with comic books, some changes people like and others don't. I just wonder how many $800 - $1,200 statues these collectors can continually afford?
That's fine, it's your point of view and I respect it.
Not very much related, but I had to look into these kind of things once for a friend's cosplay, and I'll say that certain things are much cheaper than one can expect. Namely, steel-reinforced boots, military gloves with reinforced knuckles, heavy leather motorcycle jacket with padded shoulders, elbows and (on request) spine.
I think that a top notch custom suit (upper+lower) to fit Devil's needs would cost somewhere in the 1000$ range total.
...throwing it around just in case someone here is thinking of becoming a superhero
It really depends on the argument, but just to give you an example: when XM showed the Black Widow's head sculpts, and people saw they were flawed, the community reacted and criticized them. Almost every WIP they post gets its share of comments, both positive and negative.
I can say that some arguments get tiring really fast, that's why harsher answers are given.
JEBUS some of you boys...lol. XM took some creative license with the outfit as they do with almost all of their sculpts. The degree to which they do depends n the style guide provided to them. Right now this looks fine to me, except MAYBE the pants n his right leg could be a little more fitted. Other than that this is awesome IMHO.
As for artists taking license to make changes. Well, they (we) all change little things here and there. Almost all characters have had changes done to their "classic" uniforms by various artists, because, well that is just what artists do. We fiddle with **** to make it look cool in our oppinion, and to have a little bit of "us" in each piece. I don't draw like Kirby or Ditko, so my Hulk and Spiderman look different, and have changes to them that are just my short hand. How much leeway I take depends on the piece I am working on and the reason for it. Honestly, you are fighting about artistic license. I am not saying you have to like it, he'll don't buy the piece, but artist will never stop adding their thing to a character. Heck it could just be the length of Batmans ears....lol.
All artists respect the classics, but we aren't shackled by them.
P.S. Ross has redesigned BOTH DC and Marvel worlds for future story lines. He respects the classics, but don't ever think he doesn't enjoy getting his design freak on...lol.
This is what happens when you have an 80 year old collecting statues, they just can't let go of the past....
Besides based on all the posts I've seen from buzzybean he's just some old fart that wants to complain about everything, it's the whole "Damn you kids, get off my lawn" shtick
Sweet ignorance.
The only prick here is you. You don't even bother to read, you just spill around the same nostalgic bulls**t over and over again. I'm sure that when Marvel was dying the "colored visuals" really helped them avoid bankrupt.
And now Marvel is investing a s**tload of money in movies because people love spandex and colored diapers of course.
Move on, do yourself a favor and go cry in a corner babbling about the good ol' times.
Oh come on Spidey,
Other World/Universe/Timeline redesigns aside, this is supposed to be Daredevil. Not Earth X Daredevil, Not House of M Daredevil, but Daredevil. And this is a bit beyond the length of his horns or a the treads on his boots. So people that may have wanted to buy Daredevil from XM and wanted something that looked like, well, Daredevil, are going to be disappointed. Even with my issues on their Hulk and Captain America, those are both classic designs, as is Magneto, Ant Man, Wolverine, Black Widow, Thor and Thanos. I really think this is first statue I've seen where the costume is completely outside the comics.
Enter your email address to join: