XM Studios Iron Man 3 Statue

[yodasan]

...
Personally, I'd go with XM. Doesn't HTs IM pieces have a history of fading issues? Not saying ALL do, but isn't that a wide spread concern with this line?

I'm not sure but I don't think there have been many reports (yet!) of fading being a problem with the 1/4 Mark 42.

 

[Chapter 2099]

I'm not sure but I don't think there have been many reports (yet!) of fading being a problem with the 1/4 Mark 42.

Does anyone have pics with the HT 1:4 piece with polystone pieces? Does it 'fit' in?

 

[epitaph04]

Interesting - thanks.

Curious why you let go the HT 1/4 Mark 43 - ?

Simply because the mark 42 is my favorite IM armor.

 

[epitaph04]

Crummy older pic but heres the xm 42 with the HT 43.

 

[epitaph04]

I dont have nearly as many pics of both XM and HTs mark 42 but heres a couple of rather compressed older ones I managed to find, if you'd like to compare.

 

[yodasan]

Thanks for posting that.

 

[Chapter 2099]

I give HT the advantage with the head sculpt, base, along with the battle damage on the suit, but it's still close.

 

[yodasan]

Just happened to notice BBTS has the XM Mark 42 for sale at $532 shipped.

 

[aa909]

Just happened to notice BBTS has the XM Mark 42 for sale at $532 shipped.

yeah, this one hasn't sold well at all. But how is BBTS selling that in the US directly? isn't that a regional license infringement?