Crimsonbob
Super Freak
Well i dont normally compare personally especially if their different size products. But it happens here on the boards and i dont care if people discuss it as i dont see a problem tbh.
Well i dont normally compare personally especially if their different size products. But it happens here on the boards and i dont care if people discuss it as i dont see a problem tbh.
Where it really p!$$es people off I guess is when it distracts from the actual figure the thread is supposed to be about - sorta like right now!And thats fair enough.
You guys are not dumb. I would rather call you "the perfect pop-culture consumers" with godawful "taste" in cinema. From what I can see, most of so called "collectors" here tend to spend some ridiculous ammounts of money on every piece of fresh plastic with "hollywood" and "CGI" labels on it.
You guys are not dumb. I would rather call you "the perfect pop-culture consumers" with godawful "taste" in cinema. From what I can see, most of so called "collectors" here tend to spend some ridiculous ammounts of money on every piece of fresh plastic with "hollywood" and "CGI" labels on it.
So Harsh and untrue to an extent as there's plenty of stuff i would collect from the 70's/80's but its not available on the market
What would you consider not godawful. Name 5 of your top films so we can see what your taste is?
I would love to see some figures from Carpenter's The Thing, I would love to see a proper [1/6] interpretation of the first [1979] Alien. I would gladly spend some dollars on few figures from Army of Darkness.
I would also love some figs from the original The Thing as its 1 of the best horror/sci films ever made. I have HT's figures from Alien and Aliens, and i also have a custom Evil dead II Ash. I collect OT Star Wars. I have a Salem's lot Mr Barlow etc. I wouldn't call Predator godawful as its a classic film as well.
There's lots more i would love to have but just dont have enough space as i have 80+ 1/6 figs, 4 Detolf's, loads of shelving and some statues and busts.
I would love to see a proper [1/6] interpretation of the first [1979] Alien.
I think 'interpretation' is the wrong word. We did get an interpretation and that was the problem. HT took far too much 'artistic' license on their figure.
Well at least you aren't being judgmental about itYou guys are not dumb. I would rather call you "the perfect pop-culture consumers" with godawful "taste" in cinema. From what I can see, most of so called "collectors" here tend to spend some ridiculous ammounts of money on every piece of fresh plastic with "hollywood" and "CGI" labels on it.
Well at least you aren't being judgmental about it![]()
It will always be [better or worse] interpretation unless you force GIGER to re-create it with his own hands.
Sorry, but people who spend 200 dollars on that recent Lawrence Fishbourne figure are literally eating out of trash. I wouldn't get a sleep knowing that there are starving children in Africa while I spend hundreds of dollars on some pathetic piece of plastic without any historical background behind it [I think his name was "Noland"].
Sorry, but people who spend 200 dollars on that recent Lawrence Fishbourne figure are literally eating out of trash. I wouldn't get a sleep knowing that there are starving children in Africa while I spend hundreds of dollars on some pathetic piece of plastic without any historical background behind it [I think his name was "Noland"].