Mr. Awesome
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 21, 2020
- Messages
- 1,876
- Reaction score
- 2,338
Yeah, agreed. But my god. He really put himself through hell for the role.To be fair the performance is still good, the rest however….
Yeah, agreed. But my god. He really put himself through hell for the role.To be fair the performance is still good, the rest however….
Yea he did a great job in destroying a iconic joker. ( could care less if he inspired him or was never going to be him) The GA saw him as the joker. And now the hot new thing now is Joker jokes of him getting raped in prison. I mean if they wanted to destroy the image of there characters they are doing a bang up job.This country is truly full of failing upwards in corporate America.
Phillips paid 20 million to go and destroy the DC brand.
Someone give me 20 million I can also make a bad sequel to any movie.
I have no idea the thought process of this movie. Like I don't understannd. Like was this movie made with the sole purpose to lose money? Was it made on a bet? It's weird.Do you think WB were certain they had another billion dollar hit on their hands?
Do you think WB were certain they had another billion dollar hit on their hands?
IDK, but right now they're probably thinking they should have shelved this and written it off for tax purposes just like they did with the Batgirl movie a couple of years ago. There would have been plenty of unknowing complaints from fans of the first film, but at least the merch sales wouldn't be in a nosedive.Do you think WB were certain they had another billion dollar hit on their hands?
Yeah, the merch is definitely tanking. I'd certainly be embarrassed to wear a shirt with this guy on it, let alone buy and display a $300+ figure on my shelf.IDK, but right now they're probably thinking they should have shelved this and written it off for tax purposes just like they did with the Batgirl movie a couple of years ago. There would have been plenty of unknowing complaints from fans of the first film, but at least the merch sales wouldn't be in a nosedive.
with the amount of marketing they did yes.Do you think WB were certain they had another billion dollar hit on their hands?
Are there funko pops coming for this? Lmao I know McFarlane is releasing a Murray show set that’s def gonna be a shelf warmer nowIDK, but right now they're probably thinking they should have shelved this and written it off for tax purposes just like they did with the Batgirl movie a couple of years ago. There would have been plenty of unknowing complaints from fans of the first film, but at least the merch sales wouldn't be in a nosedive.
Yup. Thought her in the role was gonna be miles better than Margot Robbie. Boy was I wrongI was one she looked great as Harley!
they didn't even make a Funko of the original joker figure.Are there funko pops coming for this? Lmao I know McFarlane is releasing a Murray show set that’s def gonna be a shelf warmer now
And I was one who couldn’t imagine her looking great as anyone lol.I was one she looked great as Harley!
Enter your email address to join: