One person's ruined is another person's improvement.
Last edited:
InArt: 1/6 Superman (Cavill)
- Thread starter Nagoya
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Amazing pics as always @Pizza 
_______
Pretty cool dioram base being offered at OSK for $260 if anyone has the space
https://onesixthkit.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=5954
_______
Pretty cool dioram base being offered at OSK for $260 if anyone has the space
https://onesixthkit.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=5954
I really like that base. Other than the stupidly placed "monument" part.Amazing pics as always @Pizza
_______
Pretty cool dioram base being offered at OSK for $260 if anyone has the space
https://onesixthkit.com/index.php?route=product/product&product_id=5954
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 2,468
I'll end up displaying these two together for now. But man, HT's Batman is so overly beefy and exaggerated compared to InArt's Superman. Throws it off a little bit.
This Superman figure looks best with some side-eye action. When people have him looking head-on like this, I can see why people say the likeness is off.
Hoping INART manages to capture realistic, more accurate proportions for Batman vs these oversized Hot Toys bodies.
Hoping INART manages to capture realistic, more accurate proportions for Batman vs these oversized Hot Toys bodies.
Redditeer28
Freakzoid
Watch out, you're starting to sound a lot like Justin.
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 2,468
Yeah but he's oversized compared to InArt's Supes. His hands and feet are twice the size of Supe's. It's a bit exaggerated. I mean I'm happy to have the whole trinity lineup. But Batman looks gigantic next to the other two.
Last edited:
Nine Inch Nails
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2018
- Messages
- 3,197
- Reaction score
- 1,976
I dont think its fair to compare a figure that came out before 2020 to a figure that is now. Now if this was the 2.0, I'd get it.
Hologram AI
Super Freak
- Joined
- May 7, 2013
- Messages
- 11,092
- Reaction score
- 13,907
Their 2.0 looks worse to me. They made him even bigger while also changing details to be more inaccurate. Honestly, I think you're better off comparing with their 1.0. Kind of scared to see how big they make their 2.0 Cavill Superman if Batman is anything to go by.
Mister Thunder Thighs over here.
I didn’t want to be the one to say it lol, but yeah, the HT BvS 2.0 is worse. Incredibly over-scaled. The proportions aren’t the only thing that are wrong with the BvS 2.0 too.
- Joined
- May 26, 2010
- Messages
- 1,599
- Reaction score
- 2,468
I’m keeping my fingers crossed that they made improvements on this before going into production. Because the promo photos of this figure looked terrible.
Their 2.0 looks worse to me. They made him even bigger while also changing details to be more inaccurate. Honestly, I think you're better off comparing with their 1.0. Kind of scared to see how big they make their 2.0 Cavill Superman if Batman is anything to go by.
Mister Thunder Thighs over here.
Pairs better with the armored figure I think
Does Batfleck look oversized compared to WW? Both HT products.
Similar threads
