1/6 Hot Toys - Batman v Superman - Batman (2.0) Collectible Figure

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

b9e20f81f521888299944c7f08d9e191.gif
 
On a base level I honestly like it what I see, however I do have some reservations. I suspect that this is a push to get to market. There's likely some musings of InArt's getting revealed overseas and that may have forced their hand.

In any case, it's a cool figure. I think I'll try it out regardless of the InArt offering.
 
1-figure feels rushed. Looks so rough. You’d think after 7 years, a 2.0 BVS Batfleck should’ve ’theoretically’ blown minds with little room for error…

And yet we got pin headed fat-zilla…

2-as soon as InArt reveals their version. HT are gonna re-tool the **** out of this. And people are gonna go “see? HT DOES listen to feedback!”

3-1.0 batfleck and cavillman already set ‘new’ standards for size. So…what? Now theyre gonna ‘re-set’ newER standards?

I don’t wanna hear anymore talk about figures from other companies being undersized or over sized. HT ARE NOT THE EFFIN 1/6 STANDARD. They can’t even keep their own **** consistent. Stupid clowns 🤣🤣🤣
 
Can't wait for this to sell out so more people cry about it. Lol I remember when the V1 sold out after the fixes and it turned out to be the best Batman we had gotten at the time, but this won't be the only one. I'm sure InArt Bats will be great, I'll own both when the time comes and just like The Batman figures. One will be for poses and the other the museum piece for my collection. That's the only way you can look at both companies now. Plus now with JND in the mix it's the battle of Titans in the hobby. What a time to be a collector.
So It Begins Helms Deep GIF by Giphy QA
 
I would never have gotten BvS Batman 1.0 if all I had to go by was Hot Toys terrible promo photos. And in fact I picked it up a year or so after it released, still new, after I had seen videos and pics of it in-hand. But anyway, I think there’s a fair chance that this figure could actually be great. For me worth potentially sacrificing the $35 NRD to make sure I can get it if it turns out to be a top tier figure like version 1.0 is.
 
1-figure feels rushed. Looks so rough. You’d think after 7 years, a 2.0 BVS Batfleck should’ve ’theoretically’ blown minds with little room for error…

And yet we got pin headed fat-zilla…

2-as soon as InArt reveals their version. HT are gonna re-tool the **** out of this. And people are gonna go “see? HT DOES listen to feedback!”

3-1.0 batfleck and cavillman already set ‘new’ standards for size. So…what? Now theyre gonna ‘re-set’ newER standards?

I don’t wanna hear anymore talk about figures from other companies being undersized or over sized. HT ARE NOT THE EFFIN 1/6 STANDARD. They can’t even keep their own **** consistent. Stupid clowns 🤣🤣🤣
Yes, why does this need to be taller than the fist version?

But overall it looks like an improvement, I like the cowl better than the 1.0 and I like that the head is able to turn and the tab doesn’t look like it will need to be manipulated to sit flat.

That said, it probably won’t motivate me to replace my 1.0
 
Last edited:
Back
Top