KamenGuyver said:
Zoolander jokes aside, I think this figure looks fantastic. I see Viggo in the sculpt, the clothing looks great and I see only minor nitpicks with the blending (or lackthereof) of weathering on the coat and the darkness of the beard. All in all just a great looking Aragorn.
Then enter the forum quality committee mercilessly revealing how wrong I was to like this figure.
I was a quality specialist at a tech support call center at my last job and I had a team of agents whom I'd monitor, evaluate, and coach. All in all the team scored pretty favorably. Sometimes I'd discuss a call with an agent's team manager and one of us would recognize "flaws" the other missed, but for the most part we pretty much agreed straight across the board.
But once a month we'd have a "calibration" session via conference call with the quality specialists, operations managers, and other team managers at a center in another state to make sure we all evaluated consistently. The calls we'd listen to as a committee would be absolutely BUTCHERED. Great calls where customers were getting EXACTLY what they wanted would be nitpicked to death on some ridiculous technicality by some manager on a power trip, swaying the group into marking the score down and failing the call. It got to the point that we'd go months before an expert agent would actually pass an evaluation in a calibration session, much less exceed (much to my chagrine.)
I see that same principle in action here. Not always, some criticism is often warranted (coughAnakinslipscough), but not on the level that we see here month in and month out. If any of us were to secretly evaluate these figures without the "mob"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fc04d/fc04dc45cccf61fd3244d619788aa2b1d3421d0c" alt="Naughty :naughty :naughty"
I think we'd appreciate them a lot more.