I think I read that the score for Into The Wild and There Will be Blood were not eligible because of some bs rules.
I was wondering why There Will Be Blood wasn't nominated for original score...I haven't seen it yet, but I've heard the score is amazing and an intrical part of the movie.....Vedder could have atleast been nominated for original song....he did get a Golden Globe in the song category....why he could get one for the GG and not Oscars makes no sense to me.
After reading the article though, I guess Vedder was still eligible since his was a song for the film I take it. I still haven't seen Into The Wild so I don't know what his contribution was.
Mad props to Cate Blanchett. Has anyone been nominated for both leading and supporting in the same year?
I was wondering why There Will Be Blood wasn't nominated for original score...I haven't seen it yet, but I've heard the score is amazing and an intrical part of the movie.....Vedder could have atleast been nominated for original song....he did get a Golden Globe in the song category....why he could get one for the GG and not Oscars makes no sense to me.
According to The Envelope L.A. Times blog, who caught wind of the rumor earlier in the day, sources told them Greenwood’s score would not make the cut because “the majority of the music was not composed specifically for the film,” which was later confirmed by Variety, saying the disqualification was attributed to a designation within Rule 16 of the Academy’s Special Rules for Music Awards (5d under “Eligibility”), which excludes “scores diluted by the use of tracked themes or other pre-existing music.”
Greenwood’s score is only 35 minutes of original music and the rest of the film contains roughly 46 minutes of pre-existing work (including selections from the works of Arvo Pärt, and Johannes Brahms’ “Concerto in D Major”). Approximately 15 minutes of Greenwood’s 2006 composition “Popcorn Superhet Receiver” is also part of that latter 46-minute figure, but again, it’s a pre-existing piece of music.
Sorry to butt in, but this is just the type of question that brings out the movie geekness in me. If you're REALLY interested (* indicates winner of Oscar for that award):
1938 - Fay Bainter for Jezebel (Spt)* and White Banners
1942 - Theresa Wright for Mrs. Miniver (Spt)* and Pride of the Yankees
1944 - Barry Fitzgerald for Going My Way -- both Best Actor & Best Spt for same film
1982 - Jessica Lange for Tootsie (Spt)* and Frances
1987 - Sigourney Weaver for Working Girl (Spt) and Gorillas in the Mist
1992 - Al Pacino for Glengarry Glen Ross (Spt) and Scent of a Woman*
1993 - Holly Hunter for The Firm (Spt) and THe Piano*
1994 - Emma Thompson for In the Name of the Father (Spt) and Remains of the Day
2002 - Julianne Moore for The Hours (Spt) and Far From Heaven
2004 - Jamie Foxx for Collateral (Spt) and Ray*
EDIT: Now I see that Bannister had pointed this out on the previous page. Doh!!
I honestly pay very little attention to these things as they have no influence on how I view a movie.
I really liked that Casey Affleck was nominated for the Jesse James movie. That was my favorite of the year.
Will probably not see the other two, unless on DVD at a later date. (Don't kill me, but DDL's style of acting does not appeal to me in any way... he seems to only play over-the-top characters in a very over-the-top manner... For instance, I couldn't STAND Gangs of New York and his part in it. He's a great actor, but his acting actually takes me out of the experience... it's more suited for stage plays rather than film, IMO.)
(Don't kill me, but DDL's style of acting does not appeal to me in any way... he seems to only play over-the-top characters in a very over-the-top manner... For instance, I couldn't STAND Gangs of New York and his part in it. He's a great actor, but his acting actually takes me out of the experience... it's more suited for stage plays rather than film, IMO.)
Enter your email address to join: