GeneralZodLives
Super Freak
Avatar is pretty but the story is ****.
Actually, now that I think about it. It's not just comic book films. What was the best reviewed film of 2007? Ratatouille. In 2008, WallE had 96% critic approval. In 2009, UP had a 98% and was the best reviewed film of the year. 2010, the top film was Toy Story 3, with 99%. 2014, the Lego film got 96%.
Where are you getting your percentages from? Rotten Tomatoes?
Avatar is pretty but the story is ****.
Yes, that's the best source.
Not in my opinion. There's many a movie that I really like or even love that they hate. And I hate that fact that people can rate a movie before it even comes out.
I've been pretty busy lately so I haven't kept up with everything going on post-oscars but I had no clue about the whole Keaton speech fiasco.
Michael Keaton hides his Oscar speech after realizing he lost - YouTube
That's heartbreaking, he must have been pretty damn confident to have it out like that.
How is that a fiasco? He had a really good chance of winning. So he had it out (assuming that's what it was) so that he wasn't nervously fumbling around with it on stage. It's not like he pulled a Zoolander or anything. I think that just makes him even more classy that he didn't try to hog the mic (he avoided it in fact) when his film won Best Picture. He apparently went from "I'm probably going to win" to "aw shucks, who am I kidding it's nice just to be on stage with my cast and crew." That's badass, IMO.
Batman is always ready, and so was Keaton, but I still don't think he was snubbed. Jake Gyllenhaal on the other hand, was snubbed from the best actor category...yet they gave Maryl Streep another undeserved nomination for an average performance in a bad film
I agree. It think Bradley Cooper should have been out and Gyllenhaal in.
I was happy with Redmayne's win. Keaton is getting more roles out of his fantastic work in Birdman, so it's really a win for him in the long run.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Enter your email address to join: