2008 Box Office

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
2rwrn20.jpg


:survivor
 
Oscars prove even less than Heisman Trophies.

:lol :rotfl

Agreed. In fact, I'd argue that box office even proves more than Oscars. At least if you have a really high box office that means you hit home with millions of people, rather than just a handful of film snobs ;)

Man, I love this stuff!
 
:lol :rotfl

Agreed. In fact, I'd argue that box office even proves more than Oscars. At least if you have a really high box office that means you hit home with millions of people, rather than just a handful of film snobs ;)

Man, I love this stuff!

Oscars certainly mean something, although its meaning is nothing important. I however take pride in the fact that I don't find enjoyment in the majority of the crap that hits theaters these days. I'd actually consider taking out a student loan to go back to school again if I watched a movie like The Mummy 3 and enjoyed it.
 
Are we looking at the same X-Files movie? The new one, right? It's only made 2/3rds of it's budget back, and it's not even in the top 10 anymore after only 2 1/2 weeks in theaters. Pretty sure it has no chance of making ANY profit in theaters.

Actually it's already made $51.3 million globally, which is a decent return even if its theatrical run ended today. Studios don't expect blockbuster numbers without blockbuster budgets anyway.

Does anyone know if production budget also includes marketing costs? Because there were a ton of huge ads for it in downtown LA and West LA, which can't be cheap.

Its marketing budget was virtually nil by Hollywood standards.
 
Oscars certainly mean something, although its meaning is nothing important. I however take pride in the fact that I don't find enjoyment in the majority of the crap that hits theaters these days. I'd actually consider taking out a student loan to go back to school again if I watched a movie like The Mummy 3 and enjoyed it.

Wow, but you like the new Apatow stuff? :confused: Like you said earlier, different strokes - because I feel the same way about some of those :)

The thing about films like The Mummy 3 and Transformers is that they're not trying to be something that they aren't. They're not trying to be Oscar winners - they're trying to be crowd-pleasers. And if they succeed at that, well, more power to them. Everyone needs to escape from life now and then in a dark theater with huge effects and sound. If all movies were like There Will Be Blood, or No Country for Old Men (which I like a lot, for the record), well, that would be pretty depressing.

It almost comes down to 'rental VS big screen' for me. Movies like The Mummy and Transformers and Iron Man = big screen or not really worth it. Movies like The Orphanage (awesome flick!) and Juno (another awesome one) and traditional Oscar fodder = rental because you don't need crazy speakers and a big screen to enjoy them. There is a place for both.

Therefore, nothing is really proved by box office with regards to a film's 'classic' status, just as nothing is really proved by Oscars. The only real measure of 'classicness', that I can see, is whether a whole new generation will know and be able to discuss the plotline 30+ years from now.

What's interesting about TDK - and it'll be cool to see if it works - is that it's trying to be something above and beyond itself. Traditionally, superheroes aren't Oscar winners. If it bridges that gap, it will be a bold statement. If it doesn't - oh well, at least the crowds of 2008 loved it! :rock

Just a question... did you like Indy 4? Because it's basically one of The Mummy films with the Indy name attached... ;)
 
Wow, but you like the new Apatow stuff? :confused: Like you said earlier, different strokes - because I feel the same way about some of those :)

Some of his recent stuff.

The thing about films like The Mummy 3 and Transformers is that they're not trying to be something that they aren't. They're not trying to be Oscar winners - they're trying to be crowd-pleasers. And if they succeed at that, well, more power to them. Everyone needs to escape from life now and then in a dark theater with huge effects and sound. If all movies were like There Will Be Blood, or No Country for Old Men (which I like a lot, for the record), well, that would be pretty depressing.

I guess what's crowd pleasing to you and I will remain at opposite ends. I get far more enjoyment out of a movie I don't have to induce a comma before I go in to see it.:medic

It almost comes down to 'rental VS big screen' for me. Movies like The Mummy and Transformers and Iron Man = big screen or not really worth it. Movies like The Orphanage (awesome flick!) and Juno (another awesome one) and traditional Oscar fodder = rental because you don't need crazy speakers and a big screen to enjoy them. There is a place for both.

I'm spoiled with my own home theater, which unfortunately means I don't make into theaters to often. It's all the same for me.

What's interesting about TDK - and it'll be cool to see if it works - is that it's trying to be something above and beyond itself. Traditionally, superheroes aren't Oscar winners. If it bridges that gap, it will be a bold statement. If it doesn't - oh well, at least the crowds loved it! :rock

"I find your lack of faith disturbing":vader

Just a question... did you like Indy 4? Because it's basically one of The Mummy films with the Indy name attached... ;)

Didn't go see it. Waiting for the Bluray. Although comparing a movie with Brenden Fraiser at the lead, who's arguably the worst actor of all time against Harrison Ford makes me a sad panda.:monkey2
 
Didn't go see it. Waiting for the Bluray. Although comparing a movie with Brenden Fraiser at the lead, who's arguably the worst actor of all time against Harrison Ford makes me a sad panda.:monkey2

Aw, come-on now, Brendan Fraser is awesome in Airheads :p And don't forget George of the Jungle and Encino Man :) It's just when he opens his mouth to form actual sentences that he gets in trouble :lol

I'm more comparing the plot than anything else. Although the acting is pretty stilted in Indy 4.

Worst actor in my book goes to Ben Affleck.

And no, I have no faith in the Oscars - either the nominating or the actual winners. Although they won back a tiny bit of my faith after ROTK won, and Depp was nominated for playing Captain Jack.

(can you tell that I'm procrastinating from actually working today :monkey3 :eek:)
 
Aw, come-on now, Brendan Fraser is awesome in Airheads :p And don't forget George of the Jungle and Encino Man :) It's just when he opens his mouth to form actual sentences that he gets in trouble :lol

I'm more comparing the plot than anything else. Although the acting is pretty stilted in Indy 4.

Worst actor in my book goes to Ben Affleck.

(can you tell that I'm procrastinating from actually working today :monkey3 :eek:)

It's been fun though. You're a nice change of pace from the typical sausages in here.:monkey1:banana:monkey1

I actually like a lot of the stuff I'm poking fun of, I just don't prefer it. It's just more fun to stoke the fire.:D
 
It's been fun though. You're a nice change of pace from the typical sausages in here.:monkey1:banana:monkey1

I actually like a lot of the stuff I'm poking fun of, I just don't prefer it. It's just more fun to stoke the fire.:D

:mwaha

It's fun, like I said I love this stuff... probably TOO much :lol

But now, I really do have to go back to work... don't rub it in Tom!
 
Back
Top