DouglasMcc
Super Freak
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2005
- Messages
- 1,227
- Reaction score
- 0
Okay, I love living in North Carolina. But after reading this story on ESPN, I am ashamed to live in the South. I know not everyone here is into sports. But an injustice like this needs to be pointed out and discussed:
https://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=wilson
I get that the kid was a little wild and confident. But if doing a little weed and accepting consensual sex is all it takes to turn a teenager into a felon ... well, half the teenagers in our country would be in jail. And, it just feels a racist to me ... I don't care what conclusions ESPN made about prosecutor ego. ANY TIME a black male gets 10 years for consensual sex with a girl only 3 years younger than him... while a white female who truly sexually abused one of her students get 90 friggin' days ... I can't accept his skin didn't play a role in it. I remember that South Park episode this year where the female teacher got out of charges for sexually assaulting one of her students by claiming alcoholism. I laughed, but deep down, I thought, "Come on... it can't be that bad." Well, apparently it is.
But what really disgusted me was the prosecutor's attitude:
In Barker's eyes, Wilson should have taken the same plea agreement as the others. Maintaining innocence in the face of the crushing wheels of justice is the ultimate act of vanity, he believes.
"I understand what he's saying," Barker says. "I think he's making a bad decision in the long run. Being branded a sex offender is not good; but at the same time, if it made the difference between spending 10 years as opposed to two? Is it worth sitting in prison for eight more years, and you're still gonna be a sex offender when you get out?" "
We teach our children to be strong, to tell the truth, and above all else, be true to themselves. And this human piece of excrement mocks him for standing up for his innocence? Then mocks him again by saying he "should have taken his medicine" and ""We can set aside his sentence," Barker says. "Legally, it's still possible for us to set aside his sentence and give him a new sentence to a lesser charge. But it's up to us. He has no control over it." So, our grand legal system has been reduced to the moral equivalent of Kneel before Zodd? This guy makes Mike Nifong look like an altar boy.
https://sports.espn.go.com/espn/eticket/story?page=wilson
I get that the kid was a little wild and confident. But if doing a little weed and accepting consensual sex is all it takes to turn a teenager into a felon ... well, half the teenagers in our country would be in jail. And, it just feels a racist to me ... I don't care what conclusions ESPN made about prosecutor ego. ANY TIME a black male gets 10 years for consensual sex with a girl only 3 years younger than him... while a white female who truly sexually abused one of her students get 90 friggin' days ... I can't accept his skin didn't play a role in it. I remember that South Park episode this year where the female teacher got out of charges for sexually assaulting one of her students by claiming alcoholism. I laughed, but deep down, I thought, "Come on... it can't be that bad." Well, apparently it is.
But what really disgusted me was the prosecutor's attitude:
In Barker's eyes, Wilson should have taken the same plea agreement as the others. Maintaining innocence in the face of the crushing wheels of justice is the ultimate act of vanity, he believes.
"I understand what he's saying," Barker says. "I think he's making a bad decision in the long run. Being branded a sex offender is not good; but at the same time, if it made the difference between spending 10 years as opposed to two? Is it worth sitting in prison for eight more years, and you're still gonna be a sex offender when you get out?" "
We teach our children to be strong, to tell the truth, and above all else, be true to themselves. And this human piece of excrement mocks him for standing up for his innocence? Then mocks him again by saying he "should have taken his medicine" and ""We can set aside his sentence," Barker says. "Legally, it's still possible for us to set aside his sentence and give him a new sentence to a lesser charge. But it's up to us. He has no control over it." So, our grand legal system has been reduced to the moral equivalent of Kneel before Zodd? This guy makes Mike Nifong look like an altar boy.