Hope he's at the Long Beach Comic-Con
How much were his prints at SDCC ??????
look up^. Are you going to that one? If he goes, you gotta hook it up man
Art Appreciation - Pin-Up Style
- Thread starter The ill Jedi
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
look up^. Are you going to that one? If he goes, you gotta hook it up man
Darth Caedus
Formerly Congerking
look up^. Are you going to that one? If he goes, you gotta hook it up man
Okay 2 for $30 was pretty much a standard around the artist booth. If I do go to the Long Beach CC, I'll hook you guys up.
Wondering why they can't sell their prints online??? Maybe because they're licensed characters ????
jimjimmyjones85
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 20,389
- Reaction score
- 127
You r rock man ! Thanks.
ANd yes it is because they do not have licenses that they cannot sell them online like that.
Darth Caedus
Formerly Congerking
Damn copyright !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
finished, inked & done!
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
Those are some serious knockers
finished, inked & done!
WOW. Would love to see that colored. Congrats Ink
WOW. Would love to see that colored. Congrats Ink
I like my original art in B&W
prints, I'm ok with colors
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
jimjimmyjones85
Super Freak
- Joined
- Jul 15, 2009
- Messages
- 20,389
- Reaction score
- 127
That's a nice Chavez piece, JJJ. 
IdeaOfEvil
Super Freak
Alright, I need you guy's(gal's) opinions. I got my Bruce Timm piece in the mail today, but it looks weird to me. On the left is what the finished piece is, the middle being the black and white composition, and the right being my own edit in Photoshop.
Timm drew in the eyes and teeth on the left which makes her look odd to me. Her jaw looks kinda retarded with the teeth and the eyes bug me. But by whiting out those areas the piece looks 100% times better to me. Should I take an eraser to the original piece and try my best to recreate what I did in Photoshop, or is that really disrespectful to the artist and his creation??
Timm drew in the eyes and teeth on the left which makes her look odd to me. Her jaw looks kinda retarded with the teeth and the eyes bug me. But by whiting out those areas the piece looks 100% times better to me. Should I take an eraser to the original piece and try my best to recreate what I did in Photoshop, or is that really disrespectful to the artist and his creation??
mike14
Freaked Out
I actually like the original more, but I'm not the one who'se going to be looking at it for the rest of my life.
If it bugs you and you think you can pull of the alterations then go nuts, but it's really not something you want to screw up (insert Captian Obvious pic here.....)
If it bugs you and you think you can pull of the alterations then go nuts, but it's really not something you want to screw up (insert Captian Obvious pic here.....)
IMO...I wouldn't mess with Timm's original drawing.
I like the fire in Jean's eyes and the teeth look okay to me.
I like the fire in Jean's eyes and the teeth look okay to me.
Shatterer of Dreams
Super Freak
Looks good to me, I like it better with eyes.
I wouldn't erase it
Darth Caedus
Formerly Congerking
It's your pic, so do as you like...I don't think it's disrespectful at all. Personally, I like the eyes and the teeth
daikkenaurora
Super Freak
I actually like the changes you made using PS. did he send the image to you already? if not, then suggest them to him and then atleast it was Timm who made the changes and not you.
IdeaOfEvil
Super Freak
Yea, he already sent me the final piece. I wasn't able to see it or the prelim before he finished the commission, so this is just how it came out.
I really love the pose and the composition over all, especially the black and white, so it's just the eyes and teeth/mouth that I feel look awkward on an otherwise really great piece. But I guess the major consensus on this board is that it's better with these details left in *shrugs*
I really love the pose and the composition over all, especially the black and white, so it's just the eyes and teeth/mouth that I feel look awkward on an otherwise really great piece. But I guess the major consensus on this board is that it's better with these details left in *shrugs*
shocktrooper_au
Super Freak
Alright, I need you guy's(gal's) opinions. I got my Bruce Timm piece in the mail today, but it looks weird to me. On the left is what the finished piece is, the middle being the black and white composition, and the right being my own edit in Photoshop.
Timm drew in the eyes and teeth on the left which makes her look odd to me. Her jaw looks kinda retarded with the teeth and the eyes bug me. But by whiting out those areas the piece looks 100% times better to me. Should I take an eraser to the original piece and try my best to recreate what I did in Photoshop, or is that really disrespectful to the artist and his creation??
In my eyes it's a big no no to $#%@ with someone elses work
JGouse0498
Super Freak
I wouldn't mess with it. Personally, I think it would be in poor taste to alter something that was specially made for you by an artist. Yes, you did pay for it and own it, so it is yours to do with what you please...BUT...altering something so minor could really come off as a slap in the face to the artist.
And with the way things spread on the Internet, it wouldn't be surprising if said alterations got back to Timm, and, if offended, it could burn your bridges with any future commissioned art.
Just something to consider.
And with the way things spread on the Internet, it wouldn't be surprising if said alterations got back to Timm, and, if offended, it could burn your bridges with any future commissioned art.
Just something to consider.
Similar threads
