Avengers: Age of Ultron (May 1st, 2015)

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
But it was believable, what part of it wasn't?

There was no need for Superman to get so close to Batman towards the end of the fight. Bat's secret weapon was to spit his gum on Sups face :lol I know that in comics, just like in wrestling, the hero/good guy has to win...or not die somehow, in Batman's case, but it just feels that sometimes the story or the plot dictates what a character is capable of rather than logic and common sense. If the antagonist was Batman, and he's the one going crazy, Superman would use his x ray vision to look for any secret weapons, and if he can't see them because of the lead , he would still dodge Batman's loogie or burn it with his heat vision in less than a second. Not to mention, even if the loogie connects, Superman is still holding Bats by the neck, just a little bit of pressure, and he snaps his neck, just as the gum starts to have an effect.
 
Of course, that's because Batman is the king of Deus Ex Machina, the ultimate Gary Stu with the most powerful plot armor, that's why he's the most overpowered character ever :lol that's why all that convenient stuff happens around him all the time.

Buuuut in this case, Superman wasn't being himself, he was stupid because of the Joker virus, remember how all the people infected act like zombies.
 
Of course, that's because Batman is the king of Deus Ex Machina, the ultimate Gary Stu with the most powerful plot armor, that's why he's the most overpowered character ever :lol

Buuuut in this case, Superman wasn't being himself, he was stupid because of the Joker virus, remember how all the people infected act like zombies.

He didn't seemed stupid to me. He was talking trash and acting more like an evil Superman, not a mindless zombie. I don't think the joker poison affected his brain capabilities or his ability to make good decisions. When Sups was fighting Batman on the street, he used his heat/laser vision at some point, and Batman said, "Nice try" or something like that, because he was prepare for it, and Sups was aware of it, so he fooled Batman making him think that he was going to attack him him, but instead, he cut the building behind Batman, making it collapse on top of his enemy(bats). That is not the act of a stupid fighter or a mindless zombie, there was a strategy and a plan of attack.
 
Yeah you're right, I remember now that the virus is supposed to make you attack all that you love, so that means Superman loves Batman (kawaii (●´ω`●) ), but you see why Superman had to get close, Batman's shields.

Dat armor though, it was pretty bestial, way more powerful than the one he used against the owls.
 
Fatigue of awesome superhero movies is a fun problem to have that I never knew I'd actually get to experience in my lifetime. I'm just enjoying the ride.

I don't think its fatigue at all, it's expensive to see a movi these days so I think people selective and just not rushing out opening weekend anymore

This movie will do very, give it a month
 
Yeah you're right, I remember now that the virus is supposed to make you attack all that you love, so that means Superman loves Batman (kawaii (●´ω`●) ), but you see why Superman had to get close, Batman's shields.

Dat armor though, it was pretty bestial, way more powerful than the one he used against the owls.

Except that the shield's were already down by the time Sups had him beat...then he did the typical villain thing, he laughed and said something instead of you know, killing Batman really quick :lol

Yeah, that new armor makes the TDKR armor suit look like a regular costume :lol I prefer the look/design of the Owls armor though. The Endgame suit reminds me of the Rhino from ASM2.
 
The first Avengers is on cable and its up to the part where Thor and Ironman go at it. Going on the fact that Supes always holds back when fighting batman, did Thor hold back when he was fighting Ironman?
 
You guys are funny. In this forum the second biggest domestic box office in history is the same as "what a fail" "superhero fatigue". :lol

I look at movies like Fast7 and Transformers and I don't think there is such thing as "fatigue". The regular people don't get tired of movie genres because they don't live and breath this stuff like we do. Superheros are here to stay, just like every other genre out there.

They've already made their budget back, so it's gravy from here on out.
 
Please elaborate Jye senpai..

Can't tonight, I have a headache. :lol

Wow...

OK, OK, Batman IS real.

:lol

Fatigue of awesome superhero movies is a fun problem to have that I never knew I'd actually get to experience in my lifetime. I'm just enjoying the ride.

:exactly:

They've already made their budget back, so it's gravy from here on out.

Not quite yet there, the next 250 million goes to RDJ. :lol
 
I've never heard of a theater shutting down all movies other than one during a weekend to fill demand like one theater around here did for AOU.

My two cinemas closest to me, one has 8 screens, 3 with AoU, all in their biggest theaters. The other has 12 screens, 4 with AoU. Haven't been there yet to see which theaters they're in. Probably go next week.

I still wonder why AoU is being shown on less screens that Assemble. Maybe that many had closed or something.
 
So I don't want to go through alllll the thread, since I just saw it today and didn't want to read spoilers, but here's my thoughts:

Agreed with others who felt like it got let down in the editing room, and I feel like the "Director's Cut" that's coming will serve it better. Overall, I enjoyed it, but I do miss the lighthearted tone of the first - a lot. Winter Soldier was great, but it had the dark tone - I always felt like the Avengers films would stay more...fun?

Liked Ultron, loved how they dealt with Vision, loved the twins. Looking forward to the "new" avengers group - my wife and I were discussing as we went in that they need to shake up the line up. Enjoyed how they did it. And despite the fact that it probably will cause some eyerolls - I like the more diverse new group.

Really liked HawkEye's arc. He deserved it after his teeny weeny roles so far...though Whedon again played us with the "didn't see that coming." I always enjoy winks like that. The only downside to it is that it kinda goes against the HE/BW flirting/history feeling in Avengers, but I'd have to see it again to decide if it still works considering this story. Really like his happy ending. I have a feeling we won't be seeing him again - it felt very "final," unlike Tony's (who we, of course, know is coming back). Makes me happy I have the figure from the first film.

I read a little while back that someone said it was like Empire Strikes Back, that it was darker than it's predecessor and felt as if it was leading up to another film. I agree, BUT...it hit it too hard right on the nose. Besides the fact that the Empire wasn't defeated and Han flew off, we didn't get told what was coming in Empire. As a lead-up to Civil War, I thought AoU works great - the established contention between CA and Tony. As a leadup to Infinity War, it tried too hard. Those who want to know, KNOW where we're heading with the stones, especially after it was revealed that Loki had one in his sceptre all along (which did, admittedly, feel like a stretch - Banner and Stark didn't pick up on that during the first one?). But we didn't need the hand-holding lines from Thor about what was coming.

Speaking of Thor, WTF was up with his random escapade out to continue his "vision"? Hoping that's fleshed out in the long edit, because as it is it seemed completely unnecessary. It's only purpose being to set up Infinity War when 1) the end credits scene did that fine and 2) us big fans already knew. Hell, even if you didn't know, leave the explanation to Infinity War - Thanos is going to have to go after all of the gems anyways.

Just my two cents.

On a side note, I'm happy that after seeing it, the only real figures I feel I want to get for the ol' shelf is Vision and maybe War Machine. I don't do one-and-done villians, I have the main six from the first film, and Falcon from WS. I wanted to get the twins originally, but with Scarlet Witch in a new costume - an actual uniform - by the end and Quicksilver in the ground, I don't feel a need to get them. Will probably wait until the next film for her.
 
I don't think its fatigue at all, it's expensive to see a movi these days so I think people selective and just not rushing out opening weekend anymore

This movie will do very, give it a month

A lot of people are getting away from seeing movies at full price, and most theaters have cheap nights during the week. I know if I didn't go to the double feature, I'd probably be going this Tuesday since that's only $4.50 all day.
 
My two cinemas closest to me, one has 8 screens, 3 with AoU, all in their biggest theaters. The other has 12 screens, 4 with AoU. Haven't been there yet to see which theaters they're in. Probably go next week.

I still wonder why AoU is being shown on less screens that Assemble. Maybe that many had closed or something.

It's being reported that the big boxing match and the Kentucky derby all had a hand in the lower than expected opening numbers.

When you add in the lower theater numbers, then there you go:

Avengers theaters 4,349
AOU theaters 4,276

Jeez, do I have to do everything around here. :lol
 
Last edited:
Weekend Report: 'Ultron's Massive $188M Debut Falls Short of 'Avengers' Record

by Ray Subers
Avengers: Age of Ultron
May 3, 2015

Avengers: Age of Ultron ruled the box office this weekend with a huge $187.7 million, which is the second-biggest debut ever. Unfortunately, the top opening ever belongs to its predecessor, Marvel's The Avengers ($207.4 million).

The Avengers sequel also continues to do strong business overseas, where it's earned $439 million before even debuting in China or Japan.

Domestically, Ultron's $187.7 million debut accounted for 85 percent of the Top 12 box office this weekend, which is a new record ahead of Spider-Man 3's 83 percent. The movie earned a bit more than the first Avengers on Friday, but its $57.2 million Saturday was 18 percent lower. It was also a bit below Iron Man 3's $62.3 million.

There was a perception heading in to the weekend that the original movie's record was going to easily be topped. In hindsight, though, that was a very unfair assumption. In the years since the first movie's opening, no other title has opened anywhere close to $200 million. To make it that high required a perfect storm of factors, which Age of Ultron couldn't quite replicate.

The biggest of these, of course, was that the original Avengers was the first opportunity for moviegoers to see all of these famous superheroes share the screen. The sequel, by its very nature, could never be expected to replicate that experience.

It would be wrong to overstate the impact of reviews, but it's likely that they had a tiny impact as well. Heading in to opening, there was a sense that the first Avengers was a top-tier superhero movie; this time around, the word was much more muted.

Finally, the movie's Saturday number likely suffered due to a handful of sporting events that drew a lot of attention. The Kentucky Derby and Clippers v. Spurs Game 7 were widely-viewed events, though neither seemed to capture the zeitgeist in the way that the Manny Pacquiao vs Floyd Mayweather fight did. These probably weren't devastating—Avengers did still have the third-biggest Saturday ever—but they could definitely have shaved a few percentage points off of the weekend. When dealing with numbers this big, that could translate in to $5 to $10 million.

All of this is meant to explain the gap between the first and second movie, not to knock the second movie's performance. A $180-million-plus debut is an exceptional result any way you look at it, and it reinforces Marvel's utter dominance over the domestic box office (it currently holds the top three openings ever).

Avengers: Age of Ultron
's audience was 59 percent male and 59 percent over the age of 25, and they awarded the movie a strong "A" CinemaScore (in comparison, the first Avengers received an "A+"). If Age of Ultron plays like the first Avengers, it will end its run with around $560 million. However, if it follows the same trajectory as Iron Man 3, it will close at $440 million. Either way, it will be one of the highest-grossing movies ever, but there's still a huge difference between those two numbers.

As expected, the rest of the movies in theaters experienced steep drops against Avengers. After opening in third place last weekend, Age of Adaline actually jumped a spot to second with $6.25 million (down 53 percent). Through 10 days, the Lionsgate romance has earned $23.4 million.

Reigning champ Furious 7 got hit hard by Avengers, plummeting 66 percent to an estimated $6.1 million. The movie has now grossed $330.5 million, and will likely close just below $350 million.

Paul Blart: Mall Cop 2
fell 62 percent to an estimated $5.55 million, which brings its total to $51.6 million. Meanwhile, DreamWorks Animation's Home (2015) made the Top Five for the sixth weekend in a row, earning $3.3 million for a new total of $158.1 million.

Even with strong reviews and word-of-mouth, sci-fi thriller Ex Machina wasn't immune to the Avengers effect. The movie fell 58 percent to an estimated $2.2 million, which takes its total to $10.9 million.

Far from the Madding Crowd
opened to an estimated $172,000 from 10 locations, which translates to a so-so per-theater average of $17,200. The Fox Searchlight romance should expand throughout the month of May.

Around-the-World Roundup


In its second weekend at the international box office, Avengers: Age of Ultron added $168 million for a new total of $439 million. According to Disney, it was off an average of 37 percent across its holdover markets.

In Mexico, it scored the biggest debut ever with $25.5 million. It had the second-highest opening Thailand ($7.4 million), and opened on par with the first movie in Spain ($6.2 million).

The next major market for Avengers is China, where it opens on May 12th. It's likely going to be a massive hit there; $200 million seems like a lock, with $300 million in play as well. It also has yet to open in Japan, where the first movie earned over $45 million.
 
I just checked prices at one of my theaters and they now charge $10 for a ticket on weekends/ $7.75 for matinees. That's a recent raise in prices. Wonder if AoU had anything to do with it?

That's why I usually go to $4.50 night at the other theater. :lol
 
Myself, my father in law and my son went yesterday in the afternoon, wasn't any cheaper during the day
1 kid combo
2 avengers soft drink cup
1 bag of m&m
1 popcorn

96.50$
 
Back
Top