batfan08
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I actually quite like that second design.
I actually quite like that second design.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice (March 24th, 2016)
- Thread starter Uncanny Web-Slinger
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Yup, it's cool, the only thing I'm not sure of is the collar, Rocafort makes it look cool, but I don't like it unless it's in his art.
Yup, it's cool, the only thing I'm not sure of is the collar, Rocafort makes it look cool, but I don't like it unless it's in his art.
The Clown Prince of Crime
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
They should keep the same suit from MOS, just make the colors brighter, and get rid of the wristbands...something like this without the red belt...
They should keep the same suit from MOS, just make the colors brighter, and get rid of the wristbands...something like this without the red belt...
Niltusk
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2011
- Messages
- 12,599
- Reaction score
- 50
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
If there's any ballistic cloth in the world that would work for a cape, even with minor protection, I'd say use the cape. Sounds almost like we're leaving the theoretical and you're making yourself a shopping list batfan.
"I'm Batfan! Eat taser and grapple hook, scum"
He'd probably have one with a along, similar to in TDKR; tear gas canisters on his belt, etc. think he'd use a cape?
If there's any ballistic cloth in the world that would work for a cape, even with minor protection, I'd say use the cape. Sounds almost like we're leaving the theoretical and you're making yourself a shopping list batfan.
"I'm Batfan! Eat taser and grapple hook, scum"
Baneofdemon22
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 2,324
- Reaction score
- 10
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I would like it closer to the classic costume. I love the brighter red, yellow, and blue. I'd think he'd want something less threatening to wear after the events in Man of Steel.
I would like it closer to the classic costume. I love the brighter red, yellow, and blue. I'd think he'd want something less threatening to wear after the events in Man of Steel.
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Well their not gonna go brighter colours based on the Batman costume, their gonna keep the costumes looking fairly similar so expect minor changes and the same muted colours.
Well their not gonna go brighter colours based on the Batman costume, their gonna keep the costumes looking fairly similar so expect minor changes and the same muted colours.
Baneofdemon22
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 2,324
- Reaction score
- 10
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
The contrast between Superman's bright red and blue, and Batman's grey and black always looked incredible to me.
The contrast between Superman's bright red and blue, and Batman's grey and black always looked incredible to me.
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
That'd be fine, I just hope they do change the design a little.
Yeah, I didn't get that, smooth boots would have been a lot better, when he comes out of the train Nam-ek threw at him, the 1st thing you see is his boot, and someone in the back said "Spiderman", he wasn't too off.
That'd be fine, I just hope they do change the design a little.
Ditto.
juanca33
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
found a couple more.. I like the one with the belt but no red undies
found a couple more.. I like the one with the belt but no red undies
GasparZizou
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
Briefs don't look bad at all, too bad they stopped making sense.
Briefs don't look bad at all, too bad they stopped making sense.
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I personally don't see them doing that. The way they've set Superman up in MoS isn't like, he doesn't seem colorful. I think he's gonna come across as a somewhat reluctant hero still grieving and adjusting, and seen as more of a threat than a guardian by the US and other heroes. A bright blue and red suit just doesn't work in the universe they set up imo.
I still prefer the original suit colouring and design. Only thing I would change is the boots and maybe the lining details on his sides.
I personally don't see them doing that. The way they've set Superman up in MoS isn't like, he doesn't seem colorful. I think he's gonna come across as a somewhat reluctant hero still grieving and adjusting, and seen as more of a threat than a guardian by the US and other heroes. A bright blue and red suit just doesn't work in the universe they set up imo.
I still prefer the original suit colouring and design. Only thing I would change is the boots and maybe the lining details on his sides.
batfan08
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
I must admit, it would be kind of cool to put together a custom "real world" Batman figure.
You know, as a roadmap of everything I'd need.
If there's any ballistic cloth in the world that would work for a cape, even with minor protection, I'd say use the cape. Sounds almost like we're leaving the theoretical and you're making yourself a shopping list batfan.
"I'm Batfan! Eat taser and grapple hook, scum"
I must admit, it would be kind of cool to put together a custom "real world" Batman figure.
You know, as a roadmap of everything I'd need.
Last edited:
batfan08
Super Freak
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
You do bring up a good point, though; why would Batman ever put himself at risk to show off his 127 different martial arts skills when he could just tase would-be rapist, mugger, or thug in the face from the safety of a rooftop.
You do bring up a good point, though; why would Batman ever put himself at risk to show off his 127 different martial arts skills when he could just tase would-be rapist, mugger, or thug in the face from the safety of a rooftop.
Frank
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2010
- Messages
- 3,664
- Reaction score
- 15
Re: Batman vs. Superman (2016)
You're really not good with synonyms or paraphrasing. For some odd reason, you just don't like that standard can be used in place of representative example which is what you were using comic books as in terms of peak form/bust size.
**** fetishizes all kinds of body parts so it resembles a circus more than an representative swath of humanity. As long as we were referring strictly to bust size, why would comics even need to compare with **** when the overall population doesn't either. Overall though these girls wouldn't be necessarily near peak form as athletes which is one of the main features in comic books character design.
To be slim athletic and busty is fairly exceptional, but we don't read comics because they're just like us. Call it exceptionalist if you want. **** isn't restricted by that, in fact it's not restricted by anything when it comes to body depictions so the point is moot.
You'd be better off asking why there aren't more dwarf superheros. At least then you'd answer you're own question.
She falls far enough that she was cast against type. Your archetype for WW is alot looser than most, and trying to invoke **** variety or liking Carter's body to Gadot's body is a desperate move that just does not work.
When I talk about bust size, you take it back to peak female form and when I address peak female form, you go back to bust sizes. The cycle continues. In both cases, Gadot is atypical in the purest sense of the word.
I directly addressed it, and what I'm what I said is that it's atypical and against type. The bust beyond being a mere focus of sexual attraction is one of the most promininet features in a full grown woman, aescetically. You either got the look or you don't and it doesn't necessarily have to be about sexual attraction. Now you can pretend it shouldn't factor in or exist, you can be just as solipsistic as you want to be. But to assume that the only reason we want to see that part of her more filled out merely from some lower instinct is out of line and very shortsighted.
I guess it follows because I haven't met many people with such low visual processing.
You didn't have to, "atypical" already means means "not typical". It's a pass/fail, even for comics. Just because an artist wants to draw her like a gaunt supermodel, doesn't mean it can't be categorized for where it lies on the overall range of depictions. You want to say that because there are certain images of her as skinny means that Gadot falls safely within a broad range. She doesn't.
I'm telling you that you can't use comics as your reference here because not only is she skinny, she has nothing going on up top. Even in the range you're alluding to the only way you could come up short in both areas is if you were reading the Blackest Night. I don't say that because I'm fetishizing her, I'm saying it because like Superman, this female needs significant physical presence and breast are intractably part of that.
Here you go!
View attachment 110765
Even with Lynda's bouffant, Gal looks more like the Leader. Look at those arms and legs, no difference at all.
See above.
She needs bulk up just to look healthy.
No, the insistence that skinny is somehow not atypical for WW (which would still be typical btw), that there is no difference outside of hips and bust between Gadot and Carter (depite the stats) or obvious visual comparison (despite distortion) in a spanish site of your choosing isn't foolish enough to deny. You might insist on crossing your eyes the rest of your life, but I'm going to call you out on it.
You are kidding yourself if you think she wasn't cast against type.
Why would I stand by your hyperbole? If the average bust in America is a D cup, maybe you need to reevaluate the comic book non-standard standard. Even the "skinny" examples you posted had a baseline bust size on a magnitude greater than Gadot's. You can't stand that apparently but you can't sit there and argue that Gadot isn't setting a new precedent for the character. That precedent is waify. You've embraced it, I've pinned it to a shadow box of oddities.
No you've established both what you don't like and what you find as an acceptable deviation within a range. I dispute the range you think you've established in the comics because it is certainly outside of comics, I reject your grasp of what it means to be typical and atypical. There is no inbetween. That you have believe bust size is purely arbitrary in the female form, especially in an idealized physical specimen like Wonder Woman is laughable. Of course it isn't, and you sound like an utter tool when you say it's petty to think otherwise.
You're really not good with synonyms or paraphrasing. For some odd reason, you just don't like that standard can be used in place of representative example which is what you were using comic books as in terms of peak form/bust size.
**** fetishizes all kinds of body parts so it resembles a circus more than an representative swath of humanity. As long as we were referring strictly to bust size, why would comics even need to compare with **** when the overall population doesn't either. Overall though these girls wouldn't be necessarily near peak form as athletes which is one of the main features in comic books character design.
To be slim athletic and busty is fairly exceptional, but we don't read comics because they're just like us. Call it exceptionalist if you want. **** isn't restricted by that, in fact it's not restricted by anything when it comes to body depictions so the point is moot.
You'd be better off asking why there aren't more dwarf superheros. At least then you'd answer you're own question.
She falls far enough that she was cast against type. Your archetype for WW is alot looser than most, and trying to invoke **** variety or liking Carter's body to Gadot's body is a desperate move that just does not work.
When I talk about bust size, you take it back to peak female form and when I address peak female form, you go back to bust sizes. The cycle continues. In both cases, Gadot is atypical in the purest sense of the word.
I directly addressed it, and what I'm what I said is that it's atypical and against type. The bust beyond being a mere focus of sexual attraction is one of the most promininet features in a full grown woman, aescetically. You either got the look or you don't and it doesn't necessarily have to be about sexual attraction. Now you can pretend it shouldn't factor in or exist, you can be just as solipsistic as you want to be. But to assume that the only reason we want to see that part of her more filled out merely from some lower instinct is out of line and very shortsighted.
I guess it follows because I haven't met many people with such low visual processing.
You didn't have to, "atypical" already means means "not typical". It's a pass/fail, even for comics. Just because an artist wants to draw her like a gaunt supermodel, doesn't mean it can't be categorized for where it lies on the overall range of depictions. You want to say that because there are certain images of her as skinny means that Gadot falls safely within a broad range. She doesn't.
I'm telling you that you can't use comics as your reference here because not only is she skinny, she has nothing going on up top. Even in the range you're alluding to the only way you could come up short in both areas is if you were reading the Blackest Night. I don't say that because I'm fetishizing her, I'm saying it because like Superman, this female needs significant physical presence and breast are intractably part of that.
Here you go!
View attachment 110765
Even with Lynda's bouffant, Gal looks more like the Leader. Look at those arms and legs, no difference at all.
See above.
She needs bulk up just to look healthy.
No, the insistence that skinny is somehow not atypical for WW (which would still be typical btw), that there is no difference outside of hips and bust between Gadot and Carter (depite the stats) or obvious visual comparison (despite distortion) in a spanish site of your choosing isn't foolish enough to deny. You might insist on crossing your eyes the rest of your life, but I'm going to call you out on it.
You are kidding yourself if you think she wasn't cast against type.
Why would I stand by your hyperbole? If the average bust in America is a D cup, maybe you need to reevaluate the comic book non-standard standard. Even the "skinny" examples you posted had a baseline bust size on a magnitude greater than Gadot's. You can't stand that apparently but you can't sit there and argue that Gadot isn't setting a new precedent for the character. That precedent is waify. You've embraced it, I've pinned it to a shadow box of oddities.
No you've established both what you don't like and what you find as an acceptable deviation within a range. I dispute the range you think you've established in the comics because it is certainly outside of comics, I reject your grasp of what it means to be typical and atypical. There is no inbetween. That you have believe bust size is purely arbitrary in the female form, especially in an idealized physical specimen like Wonder Woman is laughable. Of course it isn't, and you sound like an utter tool when you say it's petty to think otherwise.
Similar threads
