Lucas put alot of ... strange ideas into Indiana Jones.
*BEWARE SPOILERS* Alien: Romulus
- Thread starter Wor-Gar
- Start date
Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:
Lucas put alot of ... strange ideas into Indiana Jones.
No kidding. Lucas is probably kicking himself for selling the company before he could have Indy search for Epstein's Island.
New VFX Artists React video focusing on Romulus.
They break down several effects, but what's particularly interesting is the Ian Holm stuff which starts around 5:28. The unusual choice to apply a deepfake to an animatronic instead of a real person, what works about that approach, what doesn't, etc. I thought the shot of him crawling on the desk was especially clever in just how many practical elements were used.
They break down several effects, but what's particularly interesting is the Ian Holm stuff which starts around 5:28. The unusual choice to apply a deepfake to an animatronic instead of a real person, what works about that approach, what doesn't, etc. I thought the shot of him crawling on the desk was especially clever in just how many practical elements were used.
Honestly I thought that the CG Holms had a bit of a "Johnny Cab" vibe, which while not at all convincing, kind of fit the aesthetic of the setting and film IMO.
Okay all this chatter had me in the mood to check out the movie for the first time on disc and yep, once again (third viewing overall) I enjoyed every minute of it. Even the stuff that people understandably call flaws didn't bother me.
That said there were two new things that stuck out this time, both that I thought were cool (TLDR: Just some things I noticed that probably no one will care about, lol)
1. The final shot of the film is an almost *exact* reversal of the first shot. Instead of a starfield with a black shape coming into view and lighting up to reveal the salvage drone (traveling from left to right) it ends with Rain and Andy's ship's lights going out and becoming a black shape against a starfield, traveling right to left. Cool little bit of symmetry there.
2. Something that struck me about Alien 3 when I revisited it a couple months back was how the Company did *not* execute Morse at the end. Now do we really have any idea just *what* they do with him? Obviously no. But they didn't just kill him on sight, which indicates to me that they at least wanted to take a little bit of time to explore whether or not that would be necessary. Which also indicates that the Company doesn't hold grudges and isn't just murderously evil for evil's sake.
Moving forward to Romulus it is mentioned and even shown that Company androids post-ALIEN do indeed have inhibitor chips that prevent them from harming humans, even to the point where the androids themselves believe they're incapable of harming humans, until they are faced with that very specific choice of having multiple humans in danger, with some surviving *only* if others die. In that case the androids will always act (or refuse to act) in favor of the greater number of humans surviving.
Couple that with Rook's statements that the entire reason they were experimenting with Xeno DNA was to find a way to make humans become more like the "perfect organism," allowing them to adapt and survive in almost any condition, just like the Xenos do. Which suddenly creates an entirely new and fascinating perspective on the "crew expendable" mindset of the Company in previous films. According to Romulus the Company has never been about benefiting itself for its own sake, but rather for the betterment of humanity as a whole, the true "greater good" as it sees it.
Now it doesn't mean that the Company isn't also infected with any number of slimey and selfish "Burkes" or members who want the Xenos as bioweapons to squash their enemies, but they aren't *all* like that. And to me it just creates this awesome food for thought with regard to wondering just what the motives for the Company really were in any given film. Maybe Bishop II in Alien 3 really *was* telling the truth, and really *did* want to help Ripley, while simultaneously trying to extract more DNA that they lost on the Romulus. To be fair we didn't need Romulus to wonder this about Biship II, but the revelation that the Company wanted the DNA to help humanity instead of mass destruction does make the possibility he was telling the truth that much more plausible.
Maybe Burke was just the "bioweapons" opportunist, who knows. Romulus still shows that the Company can be shady AF, like at the beginning of the film where we learn that there is apparently fine print in miners' work contracts that allows those same contracts to be extended for any number of years against the workers' wills, but again we get to wonder to what degree that shadiness manifests, and for what greater purpose, justified or not.
To me it just gives the entire first "trilogy" (and Romulus as well) an extra level of verisimilitude and immersion because I can see how even normal, pragmatic people who are aware of Company practices might still think it's in their best interests to try and work the system and use the benefits of what the Company offers to their advantage since the it really isn't just a straight up "evil" organization.
Oh and in case ScoutingForToys is reading this far I did pay extra attention to the pulse rifle training scene and he did specify that it was an M-44 as opposed to the M-41A used by the Marines in ALIENS. So definitely a "newer" model, even though Marines decades later will still be using an older variety. Not that we're still debating it, I just thought it was interesting that they mentioned the model number.
That said there were two new things that stuck out this time, both that I thought were cool (TLDR: Just some things I noticed that probably no one will care about, lol)
1. The final shot of the film is an almost *exact* reversal of the first shot. Instead of a starfield with a black shape coming into view and lighting up to reveal the salvage drone (traveling from left to right) it ends with Rain and Andy's ship's lights going out and becoming a black shape against a starfield, traveling right to left. Cool little bit of symmetry there.
2. Something that struck me about Alien 3 when I revisited it a couple months back was how the Company did *not* execute Morse at the end. Now do we really have any idea just *what* they do with him? Obviously no. But they didn't just kill him on sight, which indicates to me that they at least wanted to take a little bit of time to explore whether or not that would be necessary. Which also indicates that the Company doesn't hold grudges and isn't just murderously evil for evil's sake.
Moving forward to Romulus it is mentioned and even shown that Company androids post-ALIEN do indeed have inhibitor chips that prevent them from harming humans, even to the point where the androids themselves believe they're incapable of harming humans, until they are faced with that very specific choice of having multiple humans in danger, with some surviving *only* if others die. In that case the androids will always act (or refuse to act) in favor of the greater number of humans surviving.
Couple that with Rook's statements that the entire reason they were experimenting with Xeno DNA was to find a way to make humans become more like the "perfect organism," allowing them to adapt and survive in almost any condition, just like the Xenos do. Which suddenly creates an entirely new and fascinating perspective on the "crew expendable" mindset of the Company in previous films. According to Romulus the Company has never been about benefiting itself for its own sake, but rather for the betterment of humanity as a whole, the true "greater good" as it sees it.
Now it doesn't mean that the Company isn't also infected with any number of slimey and selfish "Burkes" or members who want the Xenos as bioweapons to squash their enemies, but they aren't *all* like that. And to me it just creates this awesome food for thought with regard to wondering just what the motives for the Company really were in any given film. Maybe Bishop II in Alien 3 really *was* telling the truth, and really *did* want to help Ripley, while simultaneously trying to extract more DNA that they lost on the Romulus. To be fair we didn't need Romulus to wonder this about Biship II, but the revelation that the Company wanted the DNA to help humanity instead of mass destruction does make the possibility he was telling the truth that much more plausible.
Maybe Burke was just the "bioweapons" opportunist, who knows. Romulus still shows that the Company can be shady AF, like at the beginning of the film where we learn that there is apparently fine print in miners' work contracts that allows those same contracts to be extended for any number of years against the workers' wills, but again we get to wonder to what degree that shadiness manifests, and for what greater purpose, justified or not.
To me it just gives the entire first "trilogy" (and Romulus as well) an extra level of verisimilitude and immersion because I can see how even normal, pragmatic people who are aware of Company practices might still think it's in their best interests to try and work the system and use the benefits of what the Company offers to their advantage since the it really isn't just a straight up "evil" organization.
Oh and in case ScoutingForToys is reading this far I did pay extra attention to the pulse rifle training scene and he did specify that it was an M-44 as opposed to the M-41A used by the Marines in ALIENS. So definitely a "newer" model, even though Marines decades later will still be using an older variety. Not that we're still debating it, I just thought it was interesting that they mentioned the model number.
Last edited:
Similar threads
