Breaking Bad

Collector Freaks Forum

Help Support Collector Freaks Forum:

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
It's that he only gave one name instead of naming his wife and his daughter. Surely he regards them both enough to honor them BOTH by name, instead of just one. Referring to two people and then giving just one name in the same sentence is just wrong.

I think you might mean incessant obsession with the smallest details, and I don't think that clouds objectivity at all, in fact, it only serves to enhance it by enhancing the depth in which I will OBSERVE things, thus intensifying observation, and hence, objectivity.
I obsess over the smaller details because I think that life is important. If I didn't think life was important, then I wouldn't care about being precise or worry about any details.

breaking-bad-3-dean-norris-twitter-season-5-photo.jpg
 
SSF_Screenshot_01_zps90a4364f.jpg


This is magnificent. I feel like I have had something large and obstructive removed from my bowel :)

There he goes again breaking the forum rules by deliberately disrespecting other forum members. Not only does the act in and of itself lack class, but the words he used compounds it. That should almost be two infractions in one.
 
I've been thinking about how series tend to wrap up. In the Sopranos the bad guy dies in the end (if like me you believe this compelling theory). And everyone is expecting Walt to meet a bad end in the same way they expect Dexter to meet a bad end.

One scenario I'd be interested in seeing is Hank about to blow the lid on Walt and his entire operation - and Walt then being placed in the position of having to surrender to him, or kill him.
 
There he goes again breaking the forum rules by deliberately disrespecting other forum members. Not only does the act in and of itself lack class, but the words he used compounds it. That should almost be two infractions in one.

Are you and Blackmask related? You're a ****ing idiot.
 
Are you and Blackmask related? You're a ****ing idiot.

wtf.jpg


What the Hell did I ever do to you you retard! screw you! :monkey4 WTF! WTF IN HELL, I am not even part of their conversation :lol

How can you compare me to that guy, seriously, That's worst than Anything Nam has ever called me.
That's it, you are on my F U list buddy boy. :stick
 
Last edited:
wtf.jpg


What the Hell did I ever do to you you retard! :monkey4 WTF! WTF IN HELL, I am not even part of their conversation :lol

How can you compare me to that guy, seriously, That's worst than Anything Nam has ever called me. That's it, you are on my F_ U list buddy boy. :stick

tumblr_lwex72WAnD1r5r4uyo1_500.gif


:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl:rotfl
 
Are you and Blackmask related? You're a ****ing idiot.

So you are not familiar with the forum rules forbidding flaming, either, obviously. There should be an infraction for you as well, since that is the penalty for flaming.

https://sideshowcollectors.com/forums/faq.php?faq=new_faq_item#faq_profanity


"What will get me banned?
In any forum that encourages the free exchange of ideas differing opinions are bound to crop up -- just keep it civil, basic netiquette applies, no flames, no spamming, etc. Personal attacks, name calling and outright rudeness will not be tolerated."

So what was that you said to me again? Wasn't that a personal attack and name calling?

I have not once ever name called anyone on this forum, nor made any personal attacks, because I am very conscious of the words I use when I post. I pay such attention to how I phrase things that it becomes impossible for me to name call, because first I would need to be sloppy in my choice of words, and THEN I would have to become emotional and lash out and worry about taking the chance of insulting someone. This is a quality that you lack, and incidentally was what I initially posted about regarding the actor's speech. He was sloppy in his word choices in a funny way.
 
Last edited:
I've been thinking about how series tend to wrap up. In the Sopranos the bad guy dies in the end (if like me you believe this compelling theory). And everyone is expecting Walt to meet a bad end in the same way they expect Dexter to meet a bad end.

One scenario I'd be interested in seeing is Hank about to blow the lid on Walt and his entire operation - and Walt then being placed in the position of having to surrender to him, or kill him.

I'm hoping the show ends with Jesse killing Walt. Perfect ending, imo. :lecture
 
I think it'll be different than what everyone expects. This show is too unpredictable. Walt kills Hank, Jesse dies in a raid; Walt gets off scot free?
 
maybe Skyler shoots Walt?
Walt thinks he won and then she gets him? I could see that happening, specially if she is trying to protect the kids, or she feels Walt cannot be stopped.
 
I'm hoping the show ends with Jesse killing Walt. Perfect ending, imo. :lecture

maybe Skyler shoots Walt?
Walt thinks he won and then she gets him? I could see that happening, specially if she is trying to protect the kids, or she feels Walt cannot be stopped.

No ending that I could imagine would satisfy me. I want to be surprised by the ending. But it should feel inevitable. Therefore since I can imagine walt dying at teh hands of Jesse it fails for me. Ditto for skylar or hank.
 
I think we got a look in last season's opener where Walt had weapons/cash in the trunk and was on the run hoping to make it to Canada? Or something like that.
 
The trouble for Walt is that Skyler is in it too. Hank would surely unravel the whole carwash operation too, unless Skyler had every little detail accounted for.
 
Back
Top