I also like that President Ellis was the narrator at the museum, same President from IM3.
Was it supposed to be the president because the voice actor was Gary Sinise.
I also like that President Ellis was the narrator at the museum, same President from IM3.
Well let me say that I felt it achieved a level of verisimilitude rarely seen in comic book films. Kind of like going from the CG Clone Wars cartoon to the live-action OT. ALL of it is pure fantasy but the OT has real actors, footage, etc., and therefore feels more "real."
I felt a similar step up in that regard compared to other Marvel films (though the first Iron Man came pretty close.)
Yeah, in the Marvel Movie-Verse, he can be responsible for Cap-Wolf!He's be more than welcome in Cap 3.
@Frank, I'm not so certain if the political espionage drama was as shallow as you described, I just think it was simply painted in broad strokes.
Is it too late to make Agent Ward RS?
It's only as deep as the surface it scratches. I'm not saying it needs to be deeper in order to be entertaining. Hands down it's the best film since IM/Avengers in the MCU for me so far. A film that spends the majority of it's time appealing to a power fantasy, restricts its ability to appeal to reality. It can't do both. I enjoy them immensely, but I'm not particularly moved by any of them. The villains are actually the ones that get to represent what's really going on in the world with the heros serving as wish fullfillment, no matter how blatantly absurd.
"So I just found out I evolved power over weather because of something in my DNA said I could." Yeah, okay. Cool story though!
Hydra is actually very identifiable in what we've been seeing as within the grasp of worldy power today. Arnim Zola's algorithm essentially already exists and in play today by businesses, gangs, and governments. Someone like Cap is more an anomaly than a real representative of the "good guys", he's the one that saves the day and when he looks back at the 5-foot nothing he used to be, he's really looking at the audience. He's got the super serum and Hollywood combat moves to solve his problems, which dismisses a real life solution to a similar situation. The kind of infiltration we're talking about in SHIELD would have taken more courage by more people to overcome with few survivors. Jack Ryan would have been a mangled corpse in nearly every action scene here even with all the bullet-dodging magic he could muster.
They maintained a great amount of tension for most of the movie and that's a highmark for a CBM, but I'm not terribly worried about anyone perma-dying. After Coulsons non-death death, I was looking at Fury on the slab and thinking "uh-huh, yeah right". Now Thanos is the big bad*** looming on the horizon, but in the end what do we have, "Death Takes A Booty-Call?" Cool, just not deep.
So, in fewer words: I'd like it if more reviewers judge it within the context of genre and fewer fans need it to be ultimate expression of cinema. Half of the fan rage and bad reviews come from massively unrealistic expectations.
Will Cap age and die eventually or does he just have a super long lifespan?
I think there is truth to this, but at the same time, I think a film targeting a truly mass audience can only go so far with complex, genuinely sophisticated issues. Because otherwise, at a certain point, an audience expecting to see a comic book film is going to turn off. So for example, something as dense and complicated as Tinker, Tailor, Soldier, Spy from a couple years back couldn't be translated into a Marvel film and succeed in the way Marvel films are expected to succeed. Some would love it, some could probably handle it, but many would revolt, even if the intrigue were punctuated by crazy action scenes. I'm not saying Cap was "dumbed down" or anything, but I think the filmmakers understand that a balance has to be reached, and construct these films with that in mind. They pushed the political intrigue angle pretty dang far for a comic film, and succeeded at it, but at the end of the day, this is a comic book film for a comic film audience. They're not targeting spy film buffs.It's only as deep as the surface it scratches. I'm not saying it needs to be deeper in order to be entertaining. Hands down it's the best film since IM/Avengers in the MCU for me so far. A film that spends the majority of it's time appealing to a power fantasy, restricts its ability to appeal to reality. It can't do both. I enjoy them immensely, but I'm not particularly moved by any of them. The villains are actually the ones that get to represent what's really going on in the world with the heros serving as wish fullfillment, no matter how blatantly absurd.
Enter your email address to join: