- Joined
- Sep 8, 2006
- Messages
- 16,398
- Reaction score
- 555
Wat Tambor.
Sadly Lucas wasted Maul completely, he should have been in all three, as apart from the shadowy threat of Sidious the movies biggest short commings were the lack of a consistent bad guy. He just let them all (Jango, Sidious, Grievous) enter stage left, ponce about a bit as a minor threat then get dispatched to exit stage right.... and as there can be only one Sith apprentice a young Vader vs Maul face off would have been great in Ep III... hence IMHO Maul was wasted!
I think that Vader could have been turned prior to a fight with Maul and then Palpatine, knowing Vader was badder-ass than maul, could have given Vader the dispatching of maul as his Trials into the Sith.
Maul is 99.9% look.
I think that Vader could have been turned prior to a fight with Maul and then Palpatine, knowing Vader was badder-ass than maul, could have given Vader the dispatching of maul as his Trials into the Sith. It could have gone Something like this...Palpatine senses the anger and power in Anakin and coerces Anakin to the Dark Side and sends him after Maul. Maul finds out, gets bent, and goes after Palps but Vader catches up to him and slap-chops him.
Or
Maul is the primary Sith Lord. He sends Palpatine to infiltrate the Jedi. Palpatine senses the strength and power in Anakin and uses him to off Maul and supplant him and become the Emperor.
I disagree. Ray Park brought a dynamic to the character that was absent in pretty much every other character that was introduced in the PT. Maul had the good human fighting skills that looked good on camera as well as the added force powers that were sloppily added via special effects.
Maul doesn't have... I guess the sort of "presence" that Sidious or Dooku have. He is too obedient, like a dog, and he has no plan of action other than "kill the jedi" ("go on Maul, sick 'em! Go get the Jedi! Good boy!"). He sort of rushes into a fight with Kenobi and Qui Gon. He could never be the strategist needed to engineer the clone wars and bring about the empire. He's just an errand boy. Sidious could not be the errand boy, because he is too greedy for power. Either he's gonna be the top dog, or he's gonna die trying to become the top dog.
Maul is no strategist, and Sidious would not be a good errand boy. He can fight off anybody in a pinch, but he can't go around assassinating people on a daily basis. Just using force ligtning for too long disfigured his face.
A matured Vader could easily fit the role of Sith Lord, but Sidious just couldn't be the apprentice. If you're that old and you're still an apprentice, I think you may have missed something.
It just couldn't work.
Maul doesn't have... I guess the sort of "presence" that Sidious or Dooku have. He is too obedient, like a dog, and he has no plan of action other than "kill the jedi" ("go on Maul, sick 'em! Go get the Jedi! Good boy!"). He sort of rushes into a fight with Kenobi and Qui Gon. He could never be the strategist needed to engineer the clone wars and bring about the empire. He's just an errand boy. Sidious could not be the errand boy, because he is too greedy for power. Either he's gonna be the top dog, or he's gonna die trying to become the top dog.
Maul is no strategist, and Sidious would not be a good errand boy. He can fight off anybody in a pinch, but he can't go around assassinating people on a daily basis. Just using force ligtning for too long disfigured his face.
A matured Vader could easily fit the role of Sith Lord, but Sidious just couldn't be the apprentice. If you're that old and you're still an apprentice, I think you may have missed something.
It just couldn't work.
absolutely.
those who say maul was all look are partly right. but that is the fault of the writer/creator. if he'd been given a more motivated role in the machinations of sidious, as suggested above, he would've been a much more compelling character. as it is, maul is already totally badass and conveyed more genuine MENACE than any of the other so-called villains. with him u really felt like he was lethal.
grievous? they tried to give him a motivation and a reason for being but he was just lame. jango? please. this is PRECISELY the sort of character who should NEVER be unmasked. the main reason boba fett is so appealing is because he is so mysterious. they should've kept that air of uncertainty about both him and his "father" jango. the minute they revealed him to be temeura morrison (whom i have nothing against btw), the character became mundane and unexciting. so what if he was mercenary enough to lend his dna to the clone army program? to me that was in fact pretty stupid. if you make a living as a stealthy, behind-the-scenes asassin, the last thing u should be doing is putting your face out there for the whole world to see. u could say that he could hide in plain sight, but then why stick to his mandalorian armour and single himself out? sorry, jango was a wasted opportunity as well.
That's like saying "Those who say Chewbacca wasn't badass are partly right, but that's the fault of the writer/creator. Chewbacca could have made a great Sith Lord, but he just wasn't evil enough. If he had been meaner and more self centered he would've replaced Palpatine perfectly."
Point is: The writer/creator (Lucas obviously) didn't give him a more motivated role in the machinations of Sidious, and he is not a more compelling character. Any theoretical what if's do not improve who he actually is to the story.
Who ever told the whole world that the face they were seeing in the clones belonged to Jango? Nobody. It's possible that only the Kaminoans, a few Jedi, Palpatine, and the Clones themselves knew. Jango could have been planning to retire from the business soon, using the money he just got to settle down and raise Boba as his son, so his face being "out there" wouldn't affect him.
And anyway, no one but the Jedi generals ever really saw what a clone's face looked like (other than the Kaminoans) under their helmets, which they wore for most of the time. I doubt a single criminal on Coruscant knew what a clone's face looked like.
The whole face thing is utterly irrelevant.
WTF are you talking about?!Maul has ALL the presence he needs. He was the FACE of Star Wars for a fat chunk of the 90's. I'm willing to bet he was the 2nd most marketed character of the PT based on his presence alone! I'd rather see an elaborately choreographed lightsaber scene than a yawnfest of dialogue and plot schemes cut between actors faces with lightsabers swinging in the foreground and background. The Dooku fights were lackluster and the Palpatine fights all but ridiculous. Maul personified everything that IS the Sith. Everybody and their grandmother were on the edge of their seats during the dual of the fates scene when the doors open and little Maul walks out. Ray Park, as Maul, with his little horns and tattoos had more presence than Dooku, Emo Hayden Vader or even the PT Sidious.
Ok, so presence is not the right word. Sure, he's menacing, but so is the 3 headed dog from the 1st Harry Potter. He just doesn't seem like the kind of guy who could give orders, but would either take them or go out blindly on his own.
Having Maul as Sith Lord and Palps as his apprentice is like having Anakin from AOTC train Obi Wan from ANH.
Maul just seems young and inexperienced. Intellectually weak.
Maul was menacing. He would lead with fear, and those who were under him would obey not wanting to be in his presence because he's terrifically horrific. As for being young and inexperienced, and intellectually weak, no. He gave a seasoned veteran Jedi a run for his money and killed him. Obi Wan lost in the straight-up confrontation to Maul (or did you forget), winning through luck. Maul was cold and calculated and very much the strategist to be able to confront two Jedi at the same time.
spot on, man.
though i wouldn't go so far as to say obi-wan won through luck. that flipping-over-maul's-head-and-slicing-him-in-half move was pretty crafty.
I exlpained why by editing my previous post. If Qui Gon's saber hadn't been there, or if Maul had picked it up/destroyed it, Obi would've been toast.
true.
but perhaps obi-wan could still have done the same flip and performed a force push (or kicked him in the nuts). less dramatic, but same result. maul falls to his death.
read the post i made subsequently after that last one, dude. you're citing ridiculously extreme examples like chewbacca being a sith. c'mon. who's talking about that? not me for sure. my point simply is that maul may be underwritten but he AS HE WAS he still had more presence and thus potential to be a truly menacing and integral villain over others who WERE given the chance plot-wise but still fell way short.
that's a lot more than "nobody" dude.
your logic doesn't work simply because an insignificant little character called OBI-WAN KENOBI saw him face to face and knew of his plan. the same guy who knew what all the clones looked like. sure, he thought they were on the "good" guy's side but he knew jango wasn't and that's really the point.
true.
but perhaps obi-wan could still have done the same flip and performed a force push. less dramatic, but same result. maul falls to his death.