Honestly some patience is in order. Some only just arrived on Saturday, not sure how it's automatically guaranteed that anyone who didn't get one doesn't have one that's just on the way. This type of back and forth seems a bit premature.
It's called human rights, anyone can feel any way they want to about any thing, for any reason. It's unfair of Sideshow to send to some people and not others. People can feel it is unfair, and feel upset. This is pretty basic.
You, seemingly think that you can tell people how they should and shouldn't feel. You're obviously the authority here. Ignored.
Lol, pretty sure the Constitution says something about Sideshow being obligated to give everyone discounts
Quite the leap in logic there.
Lol, pretty sure the Constitution says something about Sideshow being obligated to give everyone discounts
All I'm trying to say is people are allowed to feel upset. I never said Sideshow HAS to give everyone a discount, obviously they can do whatever they want. I'm just saying, when someone gets a discount, another customer is allowed to want the same discount. Sideshow doesn't HAVE to give it, but the customer is allowed to feel however they want to when they don't get it, especially when no reason has been given that they didn't get it.
I'm saying it's absurd to say people can't be upset when they feel something is unfair. Where this whole conversation has gone off track is the conversation about "rights". I guess I shouldn't have said the customer is within their rights to feel upset when they feel they have been treated unfairly.
Exactly. It is the Absurd clause.
"Entitled goofs think they should get big discounts on toys because someone else did."
His logic with "unfair" is ridiculous. I mean, c'mon... that logic can be "Collector 1 can afford Hulkbuster and I can't so that isn't fair."
That is some socialism bunk.
People have a right to be upset they didn't get a code. Sideshow has the right to send codes to whoever they want. I'd probably be a little bummed if I didn't get one but I know that's the way it is so whatever.
I still strongly disagree with parts of this, but this is better.
But you're still wrong. You say you shouldn't have used the term "rights" then progressed into "human rights" so you actually did intend it to be "rights."
Until we know what the criteria to get a code is then it isn't rational to get mad- upset? Yes. Mad? No.
Not saying you're mad, but just a general comment. I've seen a lot of silly reactions to this- if I didn't get a code I'd just think "well... bummer."
Until we know what the criteria to get a code is then it isn't rational to get mad- upset? Yes. Mad? No.
Not saying you're mad, but just a general comment. I've seen a lot of silly reactions to this- if I didn't get a code I'd just think "well... bummer."
This makes me feel like we agree. I think you think I said Sideshow has to give out codes to everyone as some sort of fair treatment right. I never said anything like that. Sideshow can do whatever they want, obviously, and will continue to do so. And we don't know what the criteria is, which is why I said they should just be transparent about it. "You spent X amount of dollars within X amount of time, you get this code." Or something like that, I think people would be more understanding.
Enter your email address to join: