prefused
Super Freak
- Joined
- Apr 4, 2008
- Messages
- 4,524
- Reaction score
- 0
nope. i grew out of the "gotta catch 'em all!" mentality a long time ago.Your nights are spent alone, weeping into your pillow, aren't they.
nope. i grew out of the "gotta catch 'em all!" mentality a long time ago.Your nights are spent alone, weeping into your pillow, aren't they.
Also, there's been breakage issues straight from the box. It is a fragile figure.
i would def go for HT re-releases of ALIENS figures, the face sculpts on the old HT ALIENS look HORRIBLE
The face sculpt is horrible on the new one too so they clearly didn't up their standards for this particular series. Alas we must look to their other licenses for their really good efforts and seek alternatives for the Alien. Come on Neca, get us a 14" Alien.
Hot Toys give us Hicks!
the face sculpt is horrible on new ALIENS figures from HT?
i wasn't aware they had any new ones (sorry not too familiar with which are new vs old since i wasn't impressed, didn't do any digging)
if they could put in the same quality into some new ALIENS figures that they put into DARK KNIGHT and IRONMAN ... i would def buy the whole gang from ALIENS ... including gorman and burke
Oh. Well the Alien from the first film is the latest and thats what I was referring to. Going backwards in time from that was the dog Alien from 3, the AvP:R warrior, the Aliens (1986) version, and the AvP1 aliens were amongst the first if I'm right.
IMO the Aliens warrior had the most accurate facial resemblance to the film creature it was based on out of all of them. But the shape and probably details of the head, body and limbs weren't the most accurate.
For me theres been a 'coolness' factor with each HT alien I've gotten, and you're always particularly wowed by your first. But in my case that wore off with the paint! Innaccuracy combined with worries about deterioration and also limbs breaking off etc just kinda ruin it.