Frank
Super Freak
- Joined
- Nov 26, 2010
- Messages
- 3,664
- Reaction score
- 15
There is no consensus as such, opinions vary here as much as they do in the US or more.
My view, which is shared by many, is that yes, Osama and Al Qaeda were very much real threats, but they are the product of US foreign policy. They don't exist in isolation. In fact Osama himself was a CIA creation to begin with.
The war on terror is mostly a scam. Saudi hijackers responsible for 9/11 yet Afghanistan takes the hit, some targeted strikes against training camps there would have sufficed. Not a full blown invasion which has worsened the security and economic situation of the entire region.
Iraq was a full blown oil grab. Plain and simple.
Admire ordinary Americans and their spirit of liberty and free thinking. Hate the hypocrisy of the US government. Drone program = state sponsored terrorism. Hate our government for secretly supporting the drone program in exchange for aid and other favours.
So yeah, those are my views but you'll find they are replicated in a significant proportion of the educated population in Pakistan.
In the uneducated tribal population (much of which is not even aware that something called 9/11 once happened) - the only way the current generation knows Americans is through the drone program. That makes for a lot of hate in that section of the populace.
The Bin Laden family were power players well before 9/11. Salem Bin Laden once had his company invest in Bush Junior's oil company in the 80s and would go on to die... in Texas... in a plane crash. In politics connections are everything. We have warlords too but they wear more camouflauge than a sniper in a ghillie suit.
Over in Boston they are rightfully going through all and any connections the Tsarnaev brothers had, but I guarantee very few of our political leaders could stand up to the same scrutiny.