Buttmunch said:Its not THAT bad. Basically it was a Roger Moore film with high tech technology. Hey, if you've seen them all, you gotta finish them.
Agreed. You have to see them all... to appreciate the old ones.
Buttmunch said:Its not THAT bad. Basically it was a Roger Moore film with high tech technology. Hey, if you've seen them all, you gotta finish them.
Wor-Gar said:Agreed. You have to see them all... to appreciate the old ones.
Buttmunch said:Any Bad Bond film is better than no Bond film. If we didn't sit through the bad ones, we'd only have up to Moonraker or something. I hope Craig doesn't end up with Brosnan syndrom: First film was great and then they slowly got worse ending with basically an interactive CGI Bond film as his last film (Everything or Nothing).
Wor-Gar said:Don't all Bonds (and most franchises) go that way... they start off good and get progressively weaker...and then they get plain silly.
Buttmunch said:Indy Jones? I don't think so (at least yet ). But Yeah, for the most part that seems to happen. Look at Jurassic park!
Agent0028 said:I think with sequels the problem is that the focus becomes that the movie is profitable and not that it was good. The worst sequels seem to be the ones that come out a long time after the oirginal(s).
Buttmunch said:Its not THAT bad. Basically it was a Roger Moore film with high tech technology. Hey, if you've seen them all, you gotta finish them.
choopie said:Fortunately for me, Die Another Day was on Spike last night, so I gave up 3 hours of my evening to watch it. I can now say I've seen them all, although it was a struggle to get through it. Too much gadgetry and ridiculous technology. An ice palace?? Now I can see why it's low on list of Brosnan Bond films.
Agent0028 said:So the ice palace is real...
If they come out with an invisible car in the next few years...think the movie will improve any?
I do like the movie though. It's a fun watch, and that's really what I look for in a Bond movie, something that is a fun way to spend 2 hours.