It's so true of so many studio execs. Most of them were never creatives or care about the source material. It's only about money for them.
I mean getting Wheadon in to Marvelise JL just shows how little they really know about quality movie making. I bet they were thinking, "Make it like Marvel and we'll easily make $1B straight up and pay for all that additional work".
Anyway I guess at least Gunn has the movie making experience behind him so that's something.
But jury is still out for me. As I've said before I have an increasingly lower expectation that things will turn out well, with Zack's vision not being incorporated at all.
I think James Gunn is making the right decision if he wants to wipe the slate almost completely clean.
No one in the current slate is a bona fide "movie star" If you pay Gadot a cool 20 million for WW3, can she generate enough box office on her own to warrant that risk? People will go out of their way to see a Tom Cruise movie, or a Denzel Washington movie or a Tom Hanks movie, no matter the subject, just because they are in it. I can't say the same about Gadot. Or Affleck. Or Cavill. Or even Momoa.
Better to just start over and sign no names to long term "friendly" contracts. It's pretty apparent Zaslav wants budget minded films. Which I think it completely doable. Inexpensive cast and just focus on the script and telling a good story. Spectacle alone won't do it. It's not the era of the summer blockbuster like Independence Day anymore. Where you can have a pretty mediocre popcorn film rake in the cash mostly on special effects.
I suspect Gunn will keep Peacemaker, Amanda Waller and Margot Robbie. Then just leave offshoots like the Matt Reeves' Batman franchise and the Phoenix Joker franchise alone.
And it's not like there isn't baggage. Affleck and his substance abuse issues. Ezra Miller might end up in prison. Amber Heard is going to look like poison in the Aquaman franchise. Gadot just went blindly along with Patty Jenkins for WW84, so she will come off as untrustworthy as well. Also with Cavill and The Witcher, it was clear Cavill wanted creative input , and Gunn might not vibe with that kind of setup in the DCEU. Don't get me wrong, Cavill would have a point if he said the existing power structure for the Witcher screwed up S2, but it's just more drama that Gunn might want to avoid.
There's a part of me that wants Momoa to stay if only because he comes off like a genuinely chill person. He wants no drama, he wants no dumb problems, he just wants to have fun and make a movie.
If you clean up the writing, the actors you pick, at a certain minimum talent level, don't matter. I know that will sound like heresy to some here, but Superman is the selling point, not Cavill.