One reason why I can look at Weta the other way is for 2 things:
1) The Hobbit == Weta, so I'm ok to pay a bit more premium for the brand name
By saying Hobbit=Weta is it safe for me to assume you are saying you don't mind paying more money for Weta collectibles because they are the same folks that worked on the movies? If so, no doubt there are people who share your sentiment though I think most collectors today are more concerned with quality than with the company logo on the bottom of the base, esp. given the prices collectors have to pay these days. I know Weta likes to promote the fact they are the people who worked on the movies, and it is a catchy marketing slogan, but in reality I can see little or no evidence that the Weta name on the bottom of a base has ever made that collectible more valuable. Being made by the people who worked on the movies certainly didn't help me when I sold off my SSW Gandalf and Legolas statues for $30 and $20 apiece respectively when I decided to upgrade to Sideshow's versions. And it didn't help my LCS when they lost their shirts selling off huge numbers of SSW LOTR and Weta Narnia collectibles at 25% of retail several years ago. So while they may be some "sentimental" value to owning statues produced by Weta I see no intrinsic or tangible value. Personally speaking, I am of the belief that the best place for my money is my pocket, and the day's of me paying extra for a company logo stamped on a product are long gone. In short, if I can't see it, I'm not paying for it. I'll buy anything and everything Sideshow and Weta produce based on quality and perceived value, but I will not spend one extra penny just because of who made it. Not that there is anything wrong with those who feel differently than I do, but that is something I am just not comfortable with.
2) We ask, and they produce, and cater to our needs.
It is true, and commendable, that Weta offers collectors the opportunity to share their opinions, and then act on those requests. In fairness to Sideshow, they are simply too large a company to do that which Weta has done within the realm of their environment line, but I do give credit to Weta for doing something they do not have to do. But there is a double-edged sword aspect to this business model. I think one would have to be incredibly naive to think Weta is doing this primarily out of the goodness of their heart. They are first and foremost a business, and as such, their prime objective is to make money and to their credit they have succesfully tapped into a method in which they can make money and meet the needs of their customer base. However, I have to wonder if sometimes "tipping your hand" the way collectors do in relation to these environment's is the smart thing to do, or if it always produces the expected results. I would use Barad Dur as an example of this, as there is not a doubt in my mind collectors paid a dear premium for the right to own this environment. I do not begrudge Weta one iota for charging $700 for this statue, but it would not surprise me in the least if they tacked an additional $200+ onto the retail price for no other reason than they knew how much collectors wanted it and they knew collectors would be willing to pay dearly to own one.
Admittedly, I have on rare occasion visited the Weta forum, the last time I believe, was during the big push/campaign to have Barad Dur produced. And it absolutely stunned me to read the comment's of so many people actually telling Weta they would buy it whatever the cost. I know I'm getting on in age, but am I out of touch or have IQ's dropped significantly in recent years? Telling a company you'll buy their product no matter what the cost is like slitting your wrist and jumping into shark-infested waters. It's like ringing the dinner bell only to discover you're the dinner! I knew from the second this statue was officially announced it would be the most expensive environment to date, based on it's popularity and the response/willingness of collectors to pay whatever they had to. Ironically, this stategy by collectors of telling Weta to "please take our money" seems to have backfired somewhat, with the subsequent result being that this environment is beyond the reach [financially] of many of those who campaigned for, and really wanted it for their collections.
It also all boils down to individual taste:
1) I happen to like Weta's generic bases
2) The limited, numbered line -- agreed that Sideshow does a better job
That is true, base preference does come down to personal taste and I only mentioned this to emphasize my belief that Sideshow is providing better value for collectors. The Weta bases do manage to successfully cut production costs allowing Weta to increase their profit ratio, but I really don't see any benefit for collectors. They do provide a function though I do not personally consider these mass produced, "one size/color fits all" bases to be anything remotely artistic in nature. I much prefer the bases Weta used on classic statues such as the original balrog and cave troll, or the bases Sideshow currently uses on their PF and maquette lines. I think I just appeciate the additional time, effort and creativity required to produce these individually designed bases, and the extra dimension they add to the Sideshow statues. But regardless of whether one prefers the Sideshow or Weta bases, I think it pretty obvious that Sideshow's production cost's, where the bases are concerned, are significantly higher than Weta's. And personally speaking, I would rather pay $250 for a statue with an individually designed base/environment than $250 for one with a plain black base and the name "Weta" stamped on the bottom.
Last edited: