LIBBY1957DOG
Super Freak
- Joined
- Mar 13, 2007
- Messages
- 2,344
- Reaction score
- 234
She was shown at STGCC:[ / QUOTE]
im sure its just the lighting but that brow and lack of eyebrows she looks like a transsexual martian manhunter
She was shown at STGCC:[ / QUOTE]
im sure its just the lighting but that brow and lack of eyebrows she looks like a transsexual martian manhunter
she was shown at stgcc:[ / quote]
im sure its just the lighting but that brow and lack of eyebrows she looks like a transsexual martian manhunter
If it's not the lighting, I think Gamora is part Klingon.
Some Gamora concept artwork, that suit would have been awesome.
People are gonna be futzing with that hair til the end of time cuz it's so bad. Should've done it sculpted with swap out pieces to accommodate some articulation.
That forehead looks huge.
Some Gamora concept artwork, that suit would have been awesome.
She has a huge forehead, not sure what the issue is.
I wouldn't call her forehead huge. If you don't consider the HT fig's forehead "huge", fine. However, it definitely looks nothing like her actual head. Like some have said, the proto has a lumpy/double forehead characteristic to it.
My pictures were terrible y’all. They were taken with an iPhone 6s with glass separating the figures and the lights were poorly placed and not very bright.
I have no vested interest in this, or any HT figure but I can definitely say that she looked great in person; definitely better looking than Vol. 1 Gamora. The tailoring and accessories alone destroy the original and when HT decides to release proper pictures of her, I think most people will be pleased. I tried using my Canon PAS camera but those looked even worse (too dark) because of the horrible lighting that Action City setup for the HT displays.
I found a video to see the figure with better lighting :
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wpegs8muxM0
Why are people assume this one won't have rubber arms? Because she has a jacket?
Enter your email address to join: