devilof76
Super Freak
Re: Where are Hot Toys Luke and Leia?
Do we really want a naked Leia?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a7e/b8a7ee58871b8cefb37a8d370b7367eff4d18eaf" alt="Dunno :dunno :dunno"
Do we really want a naked Leia?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8a7e/b8a7ee58871b8cefb37a8d370b7367eff4d18eaf" alt="Dunno :dunno :dunno"
Well first thanks very much for thinking so highly of my ANH Vader. That's very kind and makes me reconsider whether I really need an upgrade.
Below are the only pictures I could find of my Hurricane ESB Vader. Again, these pics are from 2005 -- hence the old apartment kitchen in back that many long-timers will remember well -- so keep in mind this figure is 10 years old now. He's a bit crude compared to more modern versions but at the time he was only the 2nd Vader made after Glenn's own prototype and his first Vader to have light up saber, voice action, breathing sounds, light up belt boxes and light up (blinking in sequence) chest box. For me, at the time, it really was THE ultimate Vader.
Hurricane also made a Boba Fett for me a year later -- again, everything that should light up did, and he had voice action (the good voice) -- which can be seen in the last picture.
View attachment 158965View attachment 158966
View attachment 158967
Do we really want a naked Leia?![]()
Do we really want a naked Leia?![]()
1983 Leia, sure.
2015 Leia, aw hell naw.
No worries man.Oh, sorry mate - I just realised you probably thought I aimed that video at you - not at all, it was aimed at Lucas! My apologies.
If the new HT 'norm' becomes those horrendous rubber bodies.. they can not only keep that ****, but shove it up their MovieMasterPiece ***es.Question is, do we really want a Leia with the fugly looking rubber body that Hot Toys seems to have hired the designer of Barbie to design for them?
Thank god for another HT Star Wars thread. I was getting really worried.
Vader was just some ******* in a suit that was the Emperor's enforcer. I'm actually surprised people think he's the main character of the OT when it is so very, very clearly a classic hero's journey based on classic storytelling and mythology.
Lucas's over emphasis on the importance of Anakin and his fall is arguably one of the PT's worst failings from a writing perspective, because he was so unlikeable and it wasn't a properly written character story.
Oh, and Dr. Who...at least we aren't arguing about Star Trek. them are are some real GEEKS.
The idea of Vader still having good in him came up when ROTJ was being made. Look how much Vader's characterisation changes in all 3 movies... He is a powerful henchman in the first, ultimate ruthless baddie in the second, and then was made sympathetic in the third so he could have a change of heart and save his son after the plot twist of the second.
I concur with most of what has been said regarding Vader, but is there any supporting evidence for this statement? I know the original draft of Star Wars that was supposedly according to Lucas too long to make into one movie was in actuality just poorly written and a cluster**** of ideas that had to be rewritten. Enter Gary Kurtz.
I am sure Lucas and Kurtz knew Vader was Anakin once ESB was written even if it was left an open question to audiences. I would think they had SOME direction in mind with it being a cliffhanger ending. I feel the ending of ESB when Vader walks past Piett without choking him to death is a nice foreshadowing to "the good in him." What did Gary Kurtz ultimately want for Vader's fate? Do we know?
Is Luke going to be diecast?