A few pics I took today, absolutely amazing figure.
[/URL]
If I'm not mistaken, that's the first version of Mark I? Though 2.0 won't make that much of a difference next to Armored Batman
Fantastic photos sir, but I love the last one! The lighting is perfect -- makes the figure very life-like it looks like a screenshot!
If I'm not mistaken, that's the first version of Mark I? Though 2.0 won't make that much of a difference next to Armored Batman
Oh don't take it the wrong way, I wasn't trying to be argumentative with you haha. I just wanted to share my thoughts for some that may find the proportions of some IM figures to be a big drawback. I agree whole heartedly that the MK45 does appear to be a little...hungry lol. The only way for me to justify those proportions as well as displaying him next to other figures is what I posted earlier.
If I'm not mistaken, that's the first version of Mark I? Though 2.0 won't make that much of a difference next to Armored Batman
Fantastic photos sir, but I love the last one! The lighting is perfect -- makes the figure very life-like it looks like a screenshot!
Finally, someone put up a review
And it's his very first, good for him!
Wait, what? Superman is taller than the Mk I? No way, out of scale. No way.
I can't even own the Superman figure anymore knowing that.
Ima go back and check some of those blogger pics and see bc that reviewer said damn near zero leg & arm articulation lol. Thought I seen a few pics with his arms up a bit and legs spread.
So true. I always display mine somewhere between a straight museum pose & slight action pose anyways. Never anything drastic at all!Bloggers will do whatever it takes to get the best pictures with the free toys they get. It's another thing to do that with your own $250 toy...
Enter your email address to join: