You think? I think the scale of the skulls would look fine compared to the endo if they weren't damaged.
Enterbay figures have always been slightly oversized compared with other figures. Both Enterbay Terminators have huge noggins compared to their body size.
Scale difference has more to do with the dynamic poses you can achieve with the Endo Vs Arnie.
Arnie is more like a statue, so that gives the illusion that he a lot taller than he actually is, due to most people displaying him with his legs straight.
Looking at the figures, there isn't much difference in scale if you factor in how a skeleton would look without it's flesh, hair, clothes etc.
All look amazing on display. All are must haves for me.
Yeah I guess so, cause...besides comparing the skulls to EB´s Arnold head and to the actual skull of the endo definitely shows that the skulls are to big. The endo is build after humans, right? And the front of the skulls face is intact on the ground and CLEARLY too big...so...off scale.
And I know what you´re saying, Giger...and you´re partially right.
Of course should an endoskeleton be smaller than the actually human build full flesh terminator...but not that much.
Given, what we have here is Arnold minus shoes, skin and hair, but that doesn´t excuse a whole inch height difference to the BD.
A quarter of an inch would be realistic, not more. Cause what´s important is the heightline until his hair starts and thinking about the human skin being 2,5mm thick taken 2x... 1x at the head and 1x at the feet, plus the sole of his shoes at about an inch (2,54cm) sums it up at about 3cm height difference between Arnold and his naked endoskeleton. Divided by 4 takes the heght difference they should have in 1.4 scale to about 0.75cm.