I understand why you reacted the way you did, which is why I apologized for my lack of sensitivity and have now deleted the post, as it came across as unintentionally glib regarding your intensive research and work to replicate an obscure item.
As stated, I would never mass produce careful research without the enthusiastic consent and participation of the original modeller. I sounded very casual precisely *because* of the "collegiate context" of which you speak, and that's also why I've issued you an apology for the blunder.
Certainly no harm or mass production without permission and participation. In any case the post is deleted.
If that had been an original work of art I wouldn't have even brought it up, what I tripped over is that the piece in question is a copy of Lucasfilm IP openly posted on a forum full of customizers. I see and acknowledge the exceptional scholarship (although I failed to make that clear) required to replicate such a detail, but was indelicate in my approach because if the tables were turned, I myself wouldn't have cared -- which is not meant to invalidate how Talibane feels about the work he put in. Not everyone thinks like I do.
What I really don't want getting lost here is that I never intended to do a damn thing without Talibane jumping on board as the originator. The original post stated clearly that he had done all the hard work, albeit the phrasing was too glib.
(This has very much turned into an after-school TV special).
The way I understand it, if you decided to walk up to Scratchbuilder and replicate his intensively researched landspeeder without permission, he may have a rather strong issue with that. So smaller scale, same issue. Talibane thought I intended to bang out copies of his research and didn't respect his scholarship and time.