Thanks, that blur is called depth of field and is intentional, it gives photographs a sense of atmosphere and reality. Glad to hear you don't like it.
Call it whatever you like mate, I intentionally did therefore if it is correct to the look I wanted. If your personal preference is complete sharp soul less images, bravo, bully for you.
I like it it this way and it was my photograph. never heard a profession photographer refer to something as a "blur" though?
You don't like my photography style? That's your prerogative. But since I have no respect for your opinion, that means absolutely nothing to me.
Zero interest in carrying on this conversation further with you, so...
.....you can carry on now, nothing else to see.
Thanks, that blur is called depth of field and is intentional, it gives photographs a sense of atmosphere and reality. Glad to hear you don't like it.
Call it whatever you like mate, I intentionally did therefore if it is correct to the look I wanted. If your personal preference is complete sharp soul less images, bravo, bully for you.
I like it it this way and it was my photograph. never heard a profession photographer refer to something as a "blur" though?
You don't like my photography style? That's your prerogative. But since I have no respect for your opinion, that means absolutely nothing to me.
Zero interest in carrying on this conversation further with you, so...
.....you can carry on now, nothing else to see.
You know that you've passed the point of no return when all that you care about in that pic is the Gordon figure.
Eh, when I want to look at toys, I'm going to be focused on toys. There are plenty of other places to look at women on the internet.
Irrelevant, we're looking at a photo.
Like in the Catwoman thread.
