Is anyone still going to buy this figure? For me it represents nothing of the character that I associate with Luke Skywalker.
Is anyone still going to buy this figure? For me it represents nothing of the character that I associate with Luke Skywalker.
Did you honestly not pick up on the repetition (er - "parallels") before though?
I mean when Disney first announced a sequel trilogy, wouldn't the first thought on Luke be to make him disillusioned and in exile (Ben beard and Yoda's hut amidst mud and nature) given that Disney wanted to get rid of the old heroes (sorry, "pass the torch",) and doing what they did just seems obvious.
I think it's because people go into expecting x, y, and z to happen/happen a certain way, and when it doesn't work how they thought, they're disappointed. When you see it a second time, your mind has the rough layout of the story and you can appreciate what's there.
This happened to me with TFA. I was waiting the entire movie for Luke to show up and I missed appreciating the entire movie and all the characters. I was upset the first time, but then I rewatched it and loved it.
I thought he'd used this before setting off for Crait.
Sent from my SM-G920F using Tapatalk
Have some milk to celebrate ur PO
View attachment 383053
SW ended in 1980.
Is anyone still going to buy this figure? For me it represents nothing of the character that I associate with Luke Skywalker.
Great minds [emoji6]First thing I thought of was that! [emoji38]
Is anyone still going to buy this figure? For me it represents nothing of the character that I associate with Luke Skywalker.
I genuinely want to better understand what the specific source/cause of the objections to TLJ Luke's character is. I understand being disappointed that Luke in TLJ has changed since the original trilogy. I can understand the desire to see the character portrayed the exact same way as before. But I'm having trouble understanding the feeling that the character permanently changed on a fundamental level. If you, or anyone, could pinpoint specifically how you feel Luke permanently changed at the core of his character, I would really appreciate it.
An hour into TLJ, I almost walked out of the theater. I never thought I'd be tempted to do that during any Star Wars movie. But it was the intrigue of the evolution of Luke that kept me there, and it was seeing the hero re-awakened that made me feel satisfied with the movie overall (though the first half has parts that I will never forgive). The Luke I knew from the OT was young, kindhearted, full of hope, impulsive, impatient, and mastering the jedi arts while having a long way to go in understanding jedi philosophy. The Luke I saw in TLJ is older, kindhearted, cynical, less impulsive, a complete master of the jedi arts, and with a much deeper understanding of jedi philosophy (though still not complete). And by the end, the cynicism had partially given way to hope again, and the hero had returned.
Same with Han in Force Awakens. When we met Han in ANH, he was a selfish and carefree smuggler. After sacrifices and years of battling on the side of light, he had endured enough disappointment, heartache, tragedy, and personal loss to abandon the rebellion/resistance and try to return to a life as a carefree smuggler. Who could blame him? He saw that all his effort just ended up with the circumstances going right back to where they started. It took Rey's mention of Luke, and Maz telling him to get back in the fight (among other deeper reasons), to bring Han back to the cause.
In TLJ, we see Luke do much the same. After all his sacrifices, the Empire just morphed into the First Order, and the Dark Side had again threatened to take family away from him to serve their conquests. Guilt-ridden, and despaired, he returned to what is essentially his life as an isolated farmboy. No matter how hard he tried to fight it, the Dark Side would just bring everyone right back to the same place all over again. I can see anyone (even Luke) losing hope. But, like Han, he got the encouragement he needed to get back in the fight.
In spite of their abandoning the greater struggle in pursuit of recapturing their less painful old lives, both Han and Luke got back to being heroes. I didn't feel that Luke lost the core of his character. And the hope he did lose, he got enough of it back to kick some *** again. Where am I going wrong, or what devastating change of core principles in Luke's character am I missing? I'm willing to hate this movie as much as most here if I'm just not seeing something that others are. I won't mind admitting being wrong, or having missed something others didn't. I just want to understand.
Is anyone still going to buy this figure? For me it represents nothing of the character that I associate with Luke Skywalker.
I genuinely want to better understand what the specific source/cause of the objections to TLJ Luke's character is. I understand being disappointed that Luke in TLJ has changed since the original trilogy. I can understand the desire to see the character portrayed the exact same way as before. But I'm having trouble understanding the feeling that the character permanently changed on a fundamental level. If you, or anyone, could pinpoint specifically how you feel Luke permanently changed at the core of his character, I would really appreciate it.
An hour into TLJ, I almost walked out of the theater. I never thought I'd be tempted to do that during any Star Wars movie. But it was the intrigue of the evolution of Luke that kept me there, and it was seeing the hero re-awakened that made me feel satisfied with the movie overall (though the first half has parts that I will never forgive). The Luke I knew from the OT was young, kindhearted, full of hope, impulsive, impatient, and mastering the jedi arts while having a long way to go in understanding jedi philosophy. The Luke I saw in TLJ is older, kindhearted, cynical, less impulsive, a complete master of the jedi arts, and with a much deeper understanding of jedi philosophy (though still not complete). And by the end, the cynicism had partially given way to hope again, and the hero had returned.
Same with Han in Force Awakens. When we met Han in ANH, he was a selfish and carefree smuggler. After sacrifices and years of battling on the side of light, he had endured enough disappointment, heartache, tragedy, and personal loss to abandon the rebellion/resistance and try to return to a life as a carefree smuggler. Who could blame him? He saw that all his effort just ended up with the circumstances going right back to where they started. It took Rey's mention of Luke, and Maz telling him to get back in the fight (among other deeper reasons), to bring Han back to the cause.
In TLJ, we see Luke do much the same. After all his sacrifices, the Empire just morphed into the First Order, and the Dark Side had again threatened to take family away from him to serve their conquests. Guilt-ridden, and despaired, he returned to what is essentially his life as an isolated farmboy. No matter how hard he tried to fight it, the Dark Side would just bring everyone right back to the same place all over again. I can see anyone (even Luke) losing hope. But, like Han, he got the encouragement he needed to get back in the fight.
In spite of their abandoning the greater struggle in pursuit of recapturing their less painful old lives, both Han and Luke got back to being heroes. I didn't feel that Luke lost the core of his character. And the hope he did lose, he got enough of it back to kick some *** again. Where am I going wrong, or what devastating change of core principles in Luke's character am I missing? I'm willing to hate this movie as much as most here if I'm just not seeing something that others are. I won't mind admitting being wrong, or having missed something others didn't. I just want to understand.
Enter your email address to join: