Well he still gave his life either way, and if the whole point was to buy time for the Resistance to escape then that wouldn't have worked too well if he were obliterated by the AT-ATs in the first few seconds of his big showdown with Kylo. He's not invincible after all, and I doubt even Yoda would have been able to withstand an attack like that.
As for it being aspirational to a new generation, it's still the legendary Luke Skywalker sacrificing himself in a showdown with the entire First Order, and using the most epic Jedi Mind Trick ever to make them look like complete fools so that the Resistance would have time to escape and live on. Which seems like a pretty badass move to me.
To be fair - he only stood (well, virtually at least) in front of the ATATs
because he wasn't really there. If he actually showed up, he would be stupid to do that.
And those Resistance people watching didn't watch "the legendary Luke Skywalker sacrificing himself in a showdown with the entire First Order" - it was all just a trick. There was no showdown (and that was the subversion RJ wanted) - actual bravery was set aside for cleverness, and Luke only "sacrificed" - ie died - because he was stupid (*see below.)
And it doesn't make the First order look like fools - because the whole Resistance is standing there watching all ga-ga as well (until it's randomly suggested it's a ruse.) Luke looks 100% real so not sure how something so convincing makes the FO look stupid.
And because the whole "holo-projection can kill you" idea is so poorly set up, we have no real context to how much "sacrifice" Luke really made, or how brave he was to do it. I mean it's silly that the inference is the longer you do the projection (or the further you project?) the more deadly it becomes for the user - but then why does he stop to have a long casual chat with Leia if he's inching closer to death with every second? This just makes no sense, yet its how we're supposed to judge Luke's final act.
*Wouldn't Luke behave as if he was holding his breath underwater? Like
every second counts. So why stop to have a chat? And why not tell Leia what his plan is? Why not tell the Resistance people up front so they could make a run for it as soon as he walked out to face the FO instead of having them watch like idiots, wasting valuable time? If he had done all this, he might have been able to do the trick, save everyone AND STILL SURVIVE!
So it's not even the Crait sequence itself, but the whole lead-up and context being so totally unclear and contradictory (in terms of rules that help us understand what's happening and the stakes) that makes it so problematic. And that's before you consider that this force-projection idea unravels many aspects of the OT (like why Ben, Vader and Yoda never did it when they could/should have,) just like the TLJ lightspeed-as-weapon inconsistency that gets SOOO much play on youtube.
I dunno - I think the best way to approach the Crait ending in TLJ is to turn the sound down, blur your eyes and thinking a bit and just enjoy the visuals - then it works. Luke facing ATATs, scuffle with a bad guy in black, bad guy outsmarted, good people escaping, meditating Luke dies before twin suns. And we got our good death for Luke.
![Dunno :dunno :dunno](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/Dunno.gif)
Not sure on that - I don't remember much from the LOTR trilogy.
I can kind of agree with that. While I love the overall story arc for Luke in the ST, it does feel a bit strange to see him killed off in the second movie, after we had barely got to know him again.
He wasn't just killed off in the second movie, he was ONLY really in the second movie - his screen time in TFA is literally seconds with not a word spoken.
![Dunno :dunno :dunno](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/Dunno.gif)
I mean Luke Skywalker... is only in ONE film in the trilogy that follows ROTJ? wtf?
![LOL :lol :lol](/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/old/lol.gif)