I can’t imagine being known as the guy who “collects lots of half naked/naked dolls”. What a reputationDanoby is the one that collects lots of half naked/naked dolls?
I can’t imagine being known as the guy who “collects lots of half naked/naked dolls”. What a reputationDanoby is the one that collects lots of half naked/naked dolls?
I can’t imagine being known as the guy who “collects lots of half naked/naked dolls”. What a reputation
They also waived my $33 shipping fee today for shipping both figures separatelyFor those curious, Gundamit just messaged me letting me know they reopened POs so put my order in. Not sure how long it will last
$367+free shipping is a lot more comfortable for this figure than the $400 elsewhere. Premium members also get almost $11 in rewards which basically knocks the price down to $356. Since I shop at ShowZ often and the points work on both sites, it’s a much better deal for me
Thanks brotherFor others, the alternative accepted payment methods were better for them as some members don’t or can’t use PayPal
I saw that. My point was, that the legs of the InArt figure look more like the actual legs of the actor Henry Cavill, and that’s fine for me. They could work on the shape a bit but the thickness is ok.You might have missed the comparisons a couple pages back. Yes he looks “natural” and a human being but not the physique of the actor who plays Superman.
Same angle, both standing up. His legs are “fine” but not accurate. And for $400 you’d expect a bit more.
View attachment 665701
Danoby's always been a nut, not to mention a complete perv to boot.
And I wouldn't go that far with the console wars comparison, those guys are crazy
It's not like the Inart fans or the HT fans are swearing off the other company and solely buying their preferred product (well, other than super weirdos in denial like Danoby)
I think most of us who love how InArt are pushing the boundaries of 1/6 are still going to buy any HT figure that appeals to us, I know I sure am. I'll be in for alot of the Ahsoka figures for example.
It's just HT rested on their laurels too long, people were getting fed up with them way before IA showed up (as the examples you provided). HT already filled the powder keg themselves, and IA just happened to be the match to light it.
It's the ol':
View attachment 665698
And for all we know we may see IA in the same position someday - right now they're still hungry.
Fun fact: BVS Superman is played by Henry Cavill. That is where they get their references for the head and body
To be fair being known as the guy who collects fully dressed dolls isnt so much betterI can’t imagine being known as the guy who “collects lots of half naked/naked dolls”. What a reputation
Yeah, it's the dolls part where we really become the men our fathers wanted us to be!To be fair being known as the guy who collects fully dressed dolls isnt so much better
To be fair being known as the guy who collects fully dressed dolls isnt so much better
Never use the "D" word !!!Yeah, it's the dolls part where we really become the men our fathers wanted us to be!
My wife winds me up by getting the kids to call them Dollies or Barbies.Never use the "D" word !!!
They are;
* Collectibles
* Action figures
* Figurines
* Marionettes
The body makes him look like a little kidIn anticipation of the upcoming event in less than 3 days, here are some photos (again) from the previous exhibition. Very excited to see the updated prototype images taken like these.
In that pic, he really doesThe body makes him look like a little kid
He looks like hes standing at your door waiting for some halloween candyView attachment 665766
I’m going to have to disagree with you, padding or not his legs are bigger than that proto. Can’t find a 1:1 same photo lens as inart but you gotta see my point here. His legs are too skinny. Theres an exaggeration of muscles fibers of course but his natural legs are still bigger. Unless you can find a better picture, the legs are not accurate.I saw that. My point was, that the legs of the InArt figure look more like the actual legs of the actor Henry Cavill, and that’s fine for me. They could work on the shape a bit but the thickness is ok.
The picture: on the left that are not the natural legs of Henry Cavill and that is definitely not the natural leg physique of the actor, it’s the padding of the suit. That was my whole point since I have the feeling it gets mixed up here. I think most guys here want screen accurate leg physique but say it has to look like the actual legs of Henry Cavill and keep posting pics of Cavill without the suit as comparison. Those are two different things.
Fix the leg proportions but leave the colour as it is there. Looks perfect.In anticipation of the upcoming event in less than 3 days, here are some photos (again) from the previous exhibition. Very excited to see the updated prototype images taken like these.
No problem mate, I am not arguing that Henry has serious muscles.I’m going to have to disagree with you, padding or not his legs are bigger than that proto. Can’t find a 1:1 same photo lens as inart but you gotta see my point here. His legs are too skinny. Theres an exaggeration of muscles fibers of course but his natural legs are still bigger. Unless you can find a better picture, the legs are not accurate.
His legs are natural but they are not Henry’s legs with or without the suit. Simple as that.
View attachment 665773
Edit: I found some digging for you
View attachment 665774
Let’s say you use this for your argument, even it’s completely different lens types. Let’s agree that these are his “legs.”
It doesn’t matter if it’s accurate to Henry without the padding, they’re making Henry with the suit so his legs are bigger there. It’s like saying they made a Homelander that was looked fine because it had the actors physique without the suit padding. He would look too skinny and not accurate.
But if it’s fine to you I really don’t mind.
Enter your email address to join: