InArt - 1/6 Wonder Woman (BvS)

[T8OO]

That would be cool, but I doubt it. They were probably just struggling to think of accessories to show for a BVS WW.

Personally I'd be much more interested in a figure from the 2017 movie, with her slightly brighter armor and black cloak. And there would also be more opportunities for a second civilian look, either in her London disguise or the blue dress.

Are you ignoring her massive 1/6 scale jet behind her?

 

[HyperDrive]

I’m so happy it’s BvS based. Best DCEU WW appearance. The films and these characters all went downhill post BvS (imo).

I love the grittier look, muted colors of the suit.

To those complaining about lack of accessories, um… what else would she bring? She brings everything that’s relevant to her suited up scenes in BvS….

 

[Chopper Face]

I’m so happy it’s BvS based. Best DCEU WW appearance. The films and these characters all went downhill post BvS (imo).

I love the grittier look, muted colors of the suit.

To those complaining about lack of accessories, um… what else would she bring? She brings everything that’s relevant to her suited up scenes in BvS….

Hopefully there’s a dynamically posed or posable lasso of truth

 

[Redditeer28]

I'm hoping that they'll give us the cloak too.

 

[HyperDrive]

I'm hoping that they'll give us the cloak too.

But that doesn’t appear in BvS lol…

 

[Redditeer28]

But that doesn’t appear in BvS lol…

Yes it does, if briefly

 

[HyperDrive]

Yes it does, if briefly

lol, in a photograph

 

[Redditeer28]

lol, in a photograph

In the movie. Yes

 

[HyperDrive]

In the movie. Yes

Lol, it’s a reach. But good luck dude

 

[Redditeer28]

Lol, it’s a reach. But good luck dude

What exactly does that mean? It's literally in the movie.

 

[HyperDrive]

What exactly does that mean? It's literally in the movie.

Omg. It’s not part of her costume design in the present timeline in BvS. That’s a tease, an Easter egg foreshadowing what the audience would later see in the WW solo film.

If this was a WW based on the 2017 film, then yeah, include it. But not BvS.

 

[Redditeer28]

Omg. It’s not part of her costume design in the present timeline in BvS. That’s a tease, an Easter egg foreshadowing what the audience would later see in the WW solo film.

If this was a WW based on the 2017 film, then yeah, include it. But not BvS.

This is a figure to represent the movie. The photo is of her in the movie. I'm just saying that I'd like to get something we see her wear in the movie as an accessory for the figure from this movie. It's nothing for you to panic about.

 

[HyperDrive]

This is a figure to represent the movie. The photo is of her in the movie. I'm just saying that I'd like to get something we see her wear in the movie as an accessory for the figure from this movie. It's nothing for you to panic about.

No one is panicking. It’s just not necessary. Like I said, good luck

 

[Redditeer28]

No one is panicking. It’s just not necessary. Like I said, good luck

Never thought I'd hear someone complaining about the possibility of getting too many accessories for multiple looks but this forum keeps surprising me.

 

[sj2106]

It can be based on BvS and still include one or two pieces from her other DCEU appearances. Pretty sure other companies have done this before.

 

[HyperDrive]

Never thought I'd hear someone complaining about the possibility of getting too many accessories for multiple looks but this forum keeps surprising me.

Uh well I would lol. Things that aren’t relevant, necessary or accurate don’t belong in sets. That would also needlessly raise some sort of cost. And I assure you it’s only a very small minority who’d expect the cape to be included. What surprises me is how some of y’all seem to not get how things work.

 

[HyperDrive]

It can be based on BvS and still include one or two pieces from her other DCEU appearances. Pretty sure other companies have done this before.

You’re saying they could include other stuff from her other DCEU appearances, but we’re talking INART here. Correct me if I’m wrong, but when have they included accessories that aren’t from the specific branded film? Also, if they have done that, perhaps it’s out of stupidity?

 

[Redditeer28]

Uh well I would lol. Things that aren’t relevant, necessary

Not for you to say

or accurate

It is accurate

That would also needlessly raise some sort of cost.

It's a cloak. They don't need a likeness. It probably wouldn't be very much. Besides, aren't you the one that wants the hobbits to have an extra cloak? If you're so concerned about the cost then surely they shouldn't or if I don't believe they are necessary or relevant.

 

[HyperDrive]

Not for you to say

I can say whatever I want.

It is accurate

I mean it is to the photograph, but it’s not a super relevant accessory piece to the main character design.

It's a cloak. They don't need a likeness. It probably wouldn't be very much. Besides, aren't you the one that wants the hobbits to have an extra cloak? If you're so concerned about the cost then surely they shouldn't or if I don't believe they are necessary or relevant.

That’s completely different.

 

[JorjeCroft]

Idk why y’all are obsessed with cloaks ppl want seamless body and also cloaks